Speaker 2: All [00:12:30] rise.
Judge: Please be seated.
We are back on the record in the case State of [00:13:00] Ohio versus Andrew Griffin, case 25CR46. Mr. Griffin is present in the courtroom with his attorneys. The State of Ohio is represented as well. We are outside the presence of the jury. Mr. Vavra, is there any issues the state needs to address?
Attorney Vavra: No, Judge.
Judge: Thank you. Mr. Shamansky.
Attorney Shaman...: We're good, Your Honor. Thank you.
Judge: All right. Then Mr. Gortz, if you'll bring in the jury.
Mr. Gortz: Yes, sir.
Judge: [00:15:00] Everyone please be seated. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, good morning. Did you have any issues at all following my orders, which were no discussions in this case with anyone, no researching [00:15:30] this case, and no posting anything about this case? If there are any issues, please raise your hand. No one has raised their hand. Mr. Vavra, is the state ready to proceed with their case-in-chief?
Attorney Vavra: Yes, Judge.
Judge: You may proceed.
Attorney Vavra: Call Lisa Balog.
Speaker 1: [inaudible 00:16:02], [00:16:00] can you raise your right hand, please? Do you swear the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do.
Speaker 1: Have a seat and make yourself comfortable.
Judge: Ma'am, do you object to being filmed?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do. I object.
Judge: All right. You may proceed, Mr. Kinsler.
Attorney Kinsle...: Thank you, Your Honor. Please state your name for the record.
Lisa Danielle B...: My name is Lisa [00:16:30] Danielle Balog, B-A-L-O-G.
Attorney Kinsle...: Thank you. Now, Lisa, do your best to keep your voice up so everyone can hear you.
Lisa Danielle B...: Sure.
Attorney Kinsle...: And also do your best to kind of talk slowly so the stenographer can keep up with what you're saying.
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay.
Attorney Kinsle...: All right. Where do you live?
Lisa Danielle B...: I live in Bel Air.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. Could you speak up?
Lisa Danielle B...: I live in Bel Air.
Attorney Kinsle...: And what do you do?
Lisa Danielle B...: Right now, I help run two different locations of [00:17:00] a bakery/restaurant in a way. It's hot food items, and I manage those locations as well.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. How long have you been doing that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Since the close of our restaurant on Route 40, which was formerly Salsa Joe's that we turned into My Way Cafe. And then after a three-year contract was closed, that I then pursued [00:17:30] other avenues, but stayed within the food business.
Attorney Kinsle...: Are you related to Tom Strussion?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I am.
Attorney Kinsle...: How are you related to Tom?
Lisa Danielle B...: Tom is my brother.
Attorney Kinsle...: Where did you and Tom grow up?
Lisa Danielle B...: We grew up in Bel Air.
Attorney Kinsle...: And how many siblings did you have?
Lisa Danielle B...: I had two siblings, two brothers.
Attorney Kinsle...: [00:18:00] Okay. Who was oldest?
Lisa Danielle B...: Tommy was the oldest.
Attorney Kinsle...: How much older than you was Tommy?
Lisa Danielle B...: Tommy was seven years older.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. About how old would he have been when he died?
Lisa Danielle B...: Tommy was about to turn 52.
Attorney Kinsle...: And your other sibling, who was that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Chris Strussion.
Attorney Kinsle...: Was he older or younger than you?
Lisa Danielle B...: He was older than myself.
Attorney Kinsle...: [00:18:30] How much older than you was he?
Lisa Danielle B...: He was four years older.
Attorney Kinsle...: How are you related to Angela Strussion?
Lisa Danielle B...: Angela was my sister-in-law.
Attorney Kinsle...: And when did you first meet Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: The first time I ever remember meeting her was when my brother brought Angela for a visit to the Ohio Valley, and it was in the wintertime. [00:19:00] I believe it was after their engagement, and it was snowing. It was the first time Angela had ever seen snow.
Attorney Kinsle...: Where was Angela from?
Lisa Danielle B...: From Texas.
Attorney Kinsle...: Where were they living? You said they visited the Ohio Valley.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Where were they visiting from?
Lisa Danielle B...: They were visiting from Texas.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. You said they were engaged. Do you remember when they married?
Lisa Danielle B...: They were married October 24th, 2016.
Attorney Kinsle...: [00:19:30] You mentioned they lived in Texas?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Did they live anywhere else as a married couple?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. Do you recall when did they come to Ohio?
Lisa Danielle B...: Tommy came first to Ohio in... Well, he started to come back to this area in January of 2020 so that he could start actively looking at a location to open his restaurant and to then actively start looking at homes that [00:20:00] he and Angela could move into. That would've been probably January, February when that all started.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. And they did ultimately move to Ohio?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Where did they move?
Lisa Danielle B...: They moved to Trails End Drive just down the road from the restaurant that they had opened on Route 40 in Belmont, was maybe about a mile and a half away.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yep.
Attorney Kinsle...: And was that the Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, that was Salsa Joe's.
Attorney Kinsle...: [00:20:30] Was that the first time Tom or Angela had opened up a Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: No. He had a location in Texas that still remained, but someone else was managing that restaurant at that time.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. At Trails End, did anybody else live with Tom and Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just their pets.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. How many pets did they have?
Lisa Danielle B...: At that time, they had two rescue Labs, Jax and [00:21:00] Coco, they had Isabella, they had Gracie, and they had two cats, Polly and Frankie.
Attorney Kinsle...: You mentioned Tom having some restaurant experience before coming to Ohio.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Can you explain to that to the jury?
Lisa Danielle B...: When my brother got into the restaurant business, it started out as just a single [00:21:30] hot dog stand that then turned into locations in Tennessee because he was in Las Vegas, Nevada first, and then he went to Tennessee where he had two different places. One was like a meat and three kind of a restaurant, and then a location called the Rebel Bar and Grill. And then from there, he moved to Texas. [00:22:00] And then while in Texas, he became very intrigued by the whole smoking process of meats and learned all of that. And he had... Let me think. He had three different locations in Texas called Tommyboy Salsa. There was one within a location called The Shed, which was more of like a cafe style [00:22:30] location. And then there was one other location, but I honestly, I don't remember the name of that one, prior to opening Salsa Joe's, his first Salsa Joe's.
Attorney Kinsle...: Where was that first Salsa Joe's located?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was around the Arlington area.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. And then you mentioned what became of that business when he came to Ohio?
Lisa Danielle B...: From what I knew of it remained, but under [00:23:00] the management of a partner that was in Texas.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. Were you involved in Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: I was. From... Let's see. Salsa Joe's in Belmont was supposed to have opened March of 2020, and then COVID hit, so the date got pushed, and I was just involved in anything he needed help in preparing for the opening. And then [00:23:30] once it did open, he needed a hand just wherever he needed a hand, whether it was front of house, helping at the bar or running food or just anything that was asked of me to do at that time.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. Were you working a different job at that time as well?
Lisa Danielle B...: I was.
Attorney Kinsle...: Where did you work?
Lisa Danielle B...: I worked for Shadyside Local Schools at that time as an administrative secretary.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. And I'm sorry, [00:24:00] did you give the opening date? You mentioned that it was supposed to open in March. When did the Belmont Salsa Joe's actually open?
Lisa Danielle B...: Belmont Salsa Joe's opened actually the first week of June of 2020.
Attorney Kinsle...: What was Tom's role at Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: He was the owner, the manager, the cook, just wore many hats, and just oversaw [00:24:30] just general day-to-day operations of that location.
Attorney Kinsle...: So I heard a couple things there. He was a cook?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. First and foremost, he was the cook.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. And what would he have been responsible for cooking?
Lisa Danielle B...: I'm sorry, what was your question?
Attorney Kinsle...: What would he be responsible for cooking?
Lisa Danielle B...: So he would prepare and smoke brisket and pulled pork and wings, any of the side dishes, all of the recipes that were his creation, [00:25:00] like the big old burrito, and that was, I think, the most famous one in this valley, just to other dishes that he then added as he was here even. And that smoking process, it was a process that was every morning taking meat from the smoker every night, loading it up because the meats had to cook [00:25:30] at such a temperature and be taken off at a certain point in time, and he made sure that that happened every day.
Attorney Kinsle...: So am I understanding you to say that the meats got to smoke overnight?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, that is correct.
Attorney Kinsle...: To be ready for the next day?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: What role did Angela play in Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: So Angela, although she held a full-time job, she still played a very important vital role within the restaurant. [00:26:00] She was that person who every morning you would get a text from. It would be a group text to the servers, the bartenders, the cooks, everyone, front of house, back of house, as to how the day was going to flow. She handled payroll, which I assisted her with in one location. She handled just any of [00:26:30] the financial, I would say, operations of the business, but most importantly, kept everyone in line there with instructions, like I said, day to day.
Attorney Kinsle...: You mentioned she had a different job.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Do you know what that was?
Lisa Danielle B...: She worked for a company called Fiserv.
Attorney Kinsle...: Do you have any idea what she did or what her responsibilities were?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, I don't know her exact details of her job. I knew that [00:27:00] her job kept her in her office for long hours on Zoom calls and meetings, but at the same time, she juggled what she did for Salsa Joe's.
Attorney Kinsle...: You mentioned her office. Where was that located?
Lisa Danielle B...: That was located inside of the house on the second floor and an upstairs office.
Attorney Kinsle...: I think I heard you say... Well, I heard you use the term back of house or front of house.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Can you explain what that means?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:27:30] Back of house, meaning any of the employees who worked as a line cook or dishwasher, anyone who had a hand in the kitchen. Front of house being servers, bartenders, basically that covered front of house were just servers, bartenders.
Attorney Kinsle...: Was Angela doing this? You mentioned that she's giving kind of instructions to folks. Is she doing that at the location, [00:28:00] at the restaurants?
Lisa Danielle B...: Normally, it was done remotely at her home while she was dealing with her other full-time job, but we would see her through the day sometimes because she would go and she would make Sam's Club runs for the restaurant. She would stop in and have lunch. She would sometimes stop and have dinner.
Attorney Kinsle...: And you mentioned, was she [00:28:30] involved in counting up cash?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. Could you describe that process for the jury?
Lisa Danielle B...: Well, counting of cash ran through the actual restaurants first, but then was handed off to her at end of day for her to reconcile the day, whether there was so much cash taken in, how much in credit cards and all of that.
Attorney Kinsle...: How did that [00:29:00] stuff get to her, those materials?
Lisa Danielle B...: Those were usually transported end of day. Each location had servers carry their own separate bags, and in those bags, the servers had to print out a report at the end of the day that showed whether they owed the house money or if the house owed them money attached with receipts of any credit [00:29:30] card cash sales that would go into a black bag. That black bag at the end of the night was normally put into a bank bag along with any other cash that might have been collected from say the bar area because we really didn't have black bags. All of our money taken in or transactions were operated from one point of sale system.
Attorney Kinsle...: You said, "We didn't really have black bags." Who's the we you refer?
Lisa Danielle B...: So that would be more [00:30:00] anyone tending bar and being a server as well at that same time behind the bar.
Attorney Kinsle...: You mentioned that you were working at the school, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: You were kind of part-timing and filling in at Salsa Joe's.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: At some juncture, did Salsa Joe's become your full-time job?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, it did.
Attorney Kinsle...: Approximately when did that take place?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would've been in, I don't recall the exact date, but it would've been in June of 2021.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. And [00:30:30] you mentioned the servers have black bags?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. Would they start the day with cash in those?
Lisa Danielle B...: So each server would start with cash on them, but it wasn't cash that Salsa Joe's provided. It was just cash that the servers would have on hand and they knew to have enough cash in order to process transactions, whether it be cash transactions, [00:31:00] giving money back to your customer after paying a bill. So they all had their own startup cash before they entered their shift.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. And what did they do at the close of their shift, the server?
Lisa Danielle B...: So at the close of that shift, each was responsible for generating a report, which I then stated previously, that report would then tell these servers exactly how much [00:31:30] was owed to the house or if the house owed them.
Attorney Kinsle...: And where does the money that's owed to the house go?
Lisa Danielle B...: That's the money that was placed within the black bags along with all the receipts and any money owed to the house.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. And where did that go?
Lisa Danielle B...: That at the end of night, well, the Belmont location, it was always Tommy taking that home for then Angela to reconcile. [00:32:00] In Elm Grove, I believe that it depended on who was at Elm Grove.
Attorney Shaman...: Your Honor, object to her belief.
Judge: Hold on. Hold on.
Attorney Kinsle...: Your Honor, I could rephrase the question.
Judge: Please do.
Attorney Kinsle...: Could you speak, speaking from your own personal knowledge, who would transport that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay. Because both Andrew and Tommy shared [00:32:30] responsibilities at the Elm Grove restaurant, sometimes the bank bag would be taken by Tommy and sometimes by Andrew at the end of the night.
Attorney Kinsle...: Okay. You mentioned Andrew Griffin.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Attorney Kinsle...: Do you know that person?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do.
Attorney Kinsle...: Do you recognize him in the courtroom?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do.
Attorney Shaman...: Stipulated he's seated at couch table, Your Honor.
Attorney Kinsle...: Thank you.
Judge: So noted.
Attorney Kinsle...: When did you first meet Andrew?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:33:00] It would've been in the fall of 2020-
PART 1 OF 13 ENDS [00:33:04]
Lisa Danielle B...: It would've been in the fall of 2020, around this time, but in 2020, maybe October, November area.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember where you meet him or how you met him?
Lisa Danielle B...: At the Belmont location.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Who introduced you to him?
Lisa Danielle B...: My brother, Tommy.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. How did he introduce you to him?
Lisa Danielle B...: He just one day walked through the front doors with him and just introduced him.
Mr. Kinsler: Did Andrew wind up working at the Belmont [00:33:30] location?
Lisa Danielle B...: He more or less shadowed the Belmont location, not full-time, but sporadically, and would come in to learn the internal operations of how Salsa Joe's ran on a day-to-day basis.
Mr. Kinsler: When you say he shadowed, what sort of jobs did he shadow?
Lisa Danielle B...: Like one [00:34:00] day would come in and work front of house, learning bar drinks and recipes, learning how point of sale worked, dealing with customers. And then on another day would come in and work back of house to just see how back of house operated. Actually lending a hand, cooking, preparing recipes, and [00:34:30] sometimes washing dishes.
Mr. Kinsler: To your knowledge, was Andrew living in Ohio at that time?
Lisa Danielle B...: To my knowledge, no, he was not.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did he ultimately move to Ohio?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Who did he live with when he moved to Ohio?
Lisa Danielle B...: He lived with Tommy and Angela.
Mr. Kinsler: What timeframe did that take place?
Lisa Danielle B...: I believe that [00:35:00] it was definitely March when Salsa Joe's Elm Grove started to be renovated for grand opening.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. So, you mentioned Salsa Joe's Elm Grove.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: March is when renovations are starting?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Prior to that, when did you first learn about the Elm Grove location?
Lisa Danielle B...: To my recollection, it was the first part of that year in the wintertime, [00:35:30] like January or February.
Mr. Kinsler: And who was it that would've told you about that?
Lisa Danielle B...: It would've been my brother.
Mr. Kinsler: Tommy?
Lisa Danielle B...: Mm-hmm.
Mr. Kinsler: Did the defendant ever tell you his plans for working at either location?
Lisa Danielle B...: At that point in time, no. It was my brother who made that announcement.
Mr. Kinsler: What was that announcement?
Lisa Danielle B...: Prior to [00:36:00] March and determining that Elm Grove was going to be that second location, it was then announced that Andrew would be that person running that location.
Mr. Kinsler: You mentioned when the defendant moved to Ohio, he lived with Tom and Angelo. Do you know how long that took place?
Lisa Danielle B...: I believe roughly a month.
Mr. Kinsler: And do you know where he went after that or where he lived after that?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:36:30] Into Elm Grove area.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. At what juncture did Andrew go from working at Belmont to working at Elm Grove?
Lisa Danielle B...: I would say it wasn't really full force until [00:37:00] renovating Elm Grove, which would've been in March.
Mr. Kinsler: What was his role in that, in renovating?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just helping to get that building prepared, which a lot of work needed to be done. It needed painted. Andrew, I know went and painted it. It needed cleaned. It needed a lot of work in order to get it opened and ready for grand opening.
Mr. Kinsler: Where was that? What was that location before it [00:37:30] was the Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: So, prior to, it was Figaretti's, it was Undo's, it was Tony and Cleo's, then Salsa Joe's.
Mr. Kinsler: In addition to working at the Elm Grove location, was it your understanding that the defendant was investing in that location?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And what did you understand about that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just it was understood that he was a partner and that was his investment.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:38:00] How would you describe Andrew and Tom's relationship at that time while the renovations were going on?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just a normal business relationship with his partner. I mean, they got along and-
Mr. Kinsler: How would you describe, and during that timeframe, how would you describe Andrew's relationship with Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:38:30] Same at that moment.
Mr. Kinsler: I have some difficult questions for you, okay?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: I don't mean to pry, but these are things I need to ask you. Did your relationship with the defendant grow to something more than just coworkers?
Lisa Danielle B...: It did.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. What timeframe did that take place?
Lisa Danielle B...: From recollection, May, beginning. Okay. End of [00:39:00] April, beginning of May. I don't recall exact dates.
Mr. Kinsler: Was that a romantic relationship?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was an intimate, yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. How long did that last?
Lisa Danielle B...: Until June.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. What caused it to end?
Lisa Danielle B...: Nothing in particular really caused it to.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Do you recall, did you or he [00:39:30] end it?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, there was nothing on either end because we had a good working relationship, I felt needed to be kept that way.
Mr. Kinsler: Did you have hard feelings about that?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: To your knowledge, did the defendant have hard feelings about that ending?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, not that I'm aware of.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:40:00] How would you describe your relationship after that ended?
Lisa Danielle B...: He was gone from July until almost end of August. And then upon his return, August 23rd, that was pretty much the end of the working relationship [00:40:30] and he as a partner.
Mr. Kinsler: Did you two remain in communication while he was gone?
Lisa Danielle B...: While he was gone, yes, over several phone calls, because at that time, three days or three weeks, I'm sorry, prior to what had happened to Tommy and Angela, my brother, Chris, that we spoke of passed away.
Mr. Kinsler: So, I [00:41:00] want to clarify. When he leaves, you mentioned he left in July and he's gone until August. He, the defendant?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: At that juncture while he's gone, is there still an intimate relationship between you at that time?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. It ended prior to his leaving?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. So, in that timeframe, how was the Elm Grove location performed?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:41:30] Well, the Elm Grove location didn't even really open grand opening until end of May. So, all of June we had, and then there was Andrew's absence. But through that time from grand opening to end of June, of course, grand opening weeks are very prosperous [00:42:00] and we did well, but then things started to decline. It wasn't as prosperous, but we were dealing with a lot of different issues within that building to make it prosperous.
Mr. Kinsler: What were some of the issues you were dealing with in that building?
Lisa Danielle B...: There was a horrible sewage issue that smelled the entire building to [00:42:30] the point like customers... It was a big turn-off to customers. The flow of the traffic, because of closures of roads, routed traffic a different way to where they just weren't coming past the restaurant anymore.
Mr. Kinsler: What road was the Elm Grove location on, do you remember?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was just on the main... I don't know the name of that road, but the main road through Elm Grove.
Mr. Kinsler: And you mentioned a sewer problem [00:43:00] and it caused an odor.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: When did that first come to your attention?
Lisa Danielle B...: At some point in June, we had a heavy downpour of rain and I think that's what started it, but it was just an ongoing issue, something that was never really resolved. You might have a day or two where it was a little better, but we would keep doors opened and as to air out every place we could. We'd light candles. [00:43:30] We'd put fragrant scents out on the tables and things like that.
Mr. Kinsler: Did customers ever complain?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. You mentioned the traffic issue and that was brought on by construction, is that right?
Lisa Danielle B...: That is correct.
Mr. Kinsler: When did that first come to your attention?
Lisa Danielle B...: Pretty much as soon as we opened those doors. It was like we opened the doors and then boom, the rerouting of the traffic pattern began.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:44:00] So, that construction not started until approximately the time of the grand opening?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did that problem ever get resolved while the place was open?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, it was still ongoing.
Mr. Kinsler: Likewise, the sewage problem, was that ever resolved?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: How was it resolved?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was unresolved.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Understood.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yeah, it was unresolved. I'm sorry.
Mr. Kinsler: To [00:44:30] your knowledge, was Andrew getting paid for his work?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you know how often and what?
Lisa Danielle B...: A thousand dollars every week.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And at some juncture, was he working full-time, Andrew working full-time at Elm Grove?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, that was his full-time job.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:45:00] To your knowledge, when would he have started being full-time at Elm Grove?
Lisa Danielle B...: I would say March when renovations began.
Mr. Kinsler: And then subsequent to the grand opening, does he continue to work there?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. He worked up until end of June, and then as I said before, it was absent from July [00:45:30] 4th weekend up until August 23rd.
Mr. Kinsler: When he was working, you know, after the grand opening, when he was working, what sort of jobs would Andrew do?
Lisa Danielle B...: Pretty much the same jobs, like in the same capacity that my brother worked Belmont. He was that general manager, oversaw [00:46:00] scheduling, front of house, back of house. He was just that person to just be that face and that presence at Elm Grove.
Mr. Kinsler: Would he supervise workers there?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Would he involve in cooking?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: At some juncture, did tensions develop between Tom and Andrew?
Lisa Danielle B...: Not that I ever witnessed.
Mr. Kinsler: You've mentioned that [00:46:30] at some juncture in the summer, I think you said end of June, Andrew left?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Where did he go?
Lisa Danielle B...: He went to pick up a smoker in Tennessee that was to be taken back to Oklahoma for when he was... To conclude his time at Elm Grove and start up his own Salsa Joe's in Oklahoma.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:47:00] Okay. Where'd you get that information?
Lisa Danielle B...: I knew it to be firsthand.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did you have conversations with Andrew about that?
Lisa Danielle B...: About the smoker, and I think it was pretty known fact that that's where he was heading to get the smoker to then take it to Oklahoma. A lot of us were aware of that.
Mr. Kinsler: How long was he expected to be gone?
Lisa Danielle B...: Roughly a week.
Mr. Kinsler: And was that the case?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: How long did he wind up being gone?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:47:30] For like a month and three weeks.
Mr. Kinsler: And so, when did he leave?
Lisa Danielle B...: July 4th weekend.
Mr. Kinsler: And when did he come back?
Lisa Danielle B...: August 23rd.
Mr. Kinsler: In that timeframe, were there any complaints by Andrew about Tom?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:48:00] None.
Mr. Kinsler: Did Angela ever complain about the defendant?
Lisa Danielle B...: Not at first, after the first week gone or second week gone even, but I think as the weeks went on, she was very upset about certain vendors and bills not being paid.
Mr. Kinsler: Who was it your understanding those vendors were to be paid [00:48:30] by?
Lisa Danielle B...: By Andrew.
Mr. Kinsler: Did that cause a disruption in services or supplies?
Lisa Danielle B...: I don't believe it caused a disruption in services, but it was because, you know, Tommy and Angela made sure that everything was caught up and squared away.
Mr. Kinsler: Did the defendant [00:49:00] ever express concerns about the bank account for the business?
Lisa Danielle B...: Never to me about anything directly in the bank account that I recall.
Mr. Kinsler: Who managed social media for Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: My brother did.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And did anybody else manage that?
Lisa Danielle B...: No. Throughout his time [00:49:30] at Belmont and Elm Grove, I believed that he was the only admin who was unable to post any kind of content for Salsa Joe's.
Mr. Kinsler: At some juncture, did he share that with you?
Lisa Danielle B...: He did.
Mr. Kinsler: When was that?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would've been September 20th, 2021.
Mr. Kinsler: What was going on at that time that prompted that?
Lisa Danielle B...: They were set to leave for a Florida trip to celebrate Angela's [00:50:00] birthday, and there were things that needed posted through the week that they were anticipating to be gone. And I had a conversation with Angela the day, that Monday the 20th, because I was with her running payroll, and we were tossing ideas around about how we were going to promote what was to be a new pasta night.
She liked my ideas and [00:50:30] she said, "Well, let's get Tommy on the phone," which she did, and said, "Hey, you really need to give her that admin capability so she can run posts for us while we're gone." And surprisingly, and actually shockingly, he was like, "Okay," and he did it.
Mr. Kinsler: Why was that surprising or shocking to you?
Lisa Danielle B...: Because that was just... My brother [00:51:00] was very adamant that he'd be that person posting, and he wanted just things the way he wanted them posted, and that's just how he always was.
Mr. Kinsler: Was it common for Tommy to have large amounts of cash?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: When we say large amounts, how much are we talking about?
Lisa Danielle B...: On his person, he always carried a large amount of money in [00:51:30] his pocket.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you have any idea how large an amount of money?
Lisa Danielle B...: I would say it could range anywhere from a thousand to a few.
Mr. Kinsler: And where would he keep cash?
Lisa Danielle B...: As far as other than on his person?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes.
Lisa Danielle B...: Sometimes in the console of his truck, in their home. Those are the [00:52:00] two places I know of.
Mr. Kinsler: Was this something that... Was this common knowledge that Tommy would have large amounts of cash?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Was it common that Tommy would produce cash or show his cash?
Lisa Danielle B...: I mean, obviously when he had to pull money out, people would see, but I don't feel that it was to so much be flashy about it, but I guess more so [00:52:30] a learned behavior because of growing up, and that was kind of the practice of my grandfather, my dad, my brother, Chris, that's what they did. They just kept cash on hand.
Mr. Kinsler: You described before the process of how the server bags, servers would leave cash in their bags and that'd be transported to Angela.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Tommy was involved in that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you have any idea how much cash Tommy would be taking home from the-
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:53:00] It could honestly vary. There could be some nights where it was a large cash day, depending on how many people paid cash for their bill, and then sometimes it would be more credit card than cash, and it was the house owing servers money at the end of their shifts.
Mr. Kinsler: You mentioned that the defendant left for Oklahoma and returned in August, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: That is correct.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:53:30] Where were you at when you first saw him on that return?
Lisa Danielle B...: I was at the Elm Grove location.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Working?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Was your brother there?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And did you have a conversation with the defendant?
Lisa Danielle B...: I had one with him after he had had a meeting with my brother that occurred.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Were you present for the meeting with your brother?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, I was not present for that.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Where did that take place?
Lisa Danielle B...: On the front porch [00:54:00] of the Elm Grove location.
Mr. Kinsler: After that conversation, did you have a conversation with Andrew?
Lisa Danielle B...: I did.
Mr. Kinsler: And what did you talk about?
Lisa Danielle B...: I just asked how it went.
Mr. Kinsler: And what did he tell you?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just kind of just shook his head that it did not go well, or I believe as he had hoped or planned.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did he tell you what he told your brother?
Lisa Danielle B...: At that time, he told me [00:54:30] that he had... Well, knowing that Elm Grove was going to close, that that was kind of the direction they were heading when they came back from Florida, that he had to close the doors. And from what I was told, Andrew offered-
Speaker 3: Object as to what she was told, Your Honor.
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay.
Judge: Hold on for one second. Can you rephrase the question?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:55:00] To be clear, I'm asking you what Andrew told you, okay? What did Andrew tell you about that conversation with Tom?
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay, understood. Andrew told me that he offered to buy out Salsa Joe's and create then his own LLC and for whatever money was left in the bank account for my brother to just take and walk away from it, [00:55:30] and then he would remain in Elm Grove and operate that location.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did he tell you, was his plan or was that offer intended that Salsa Joe's Elm Grove would remain a Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: From my knowledge, yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did the defendant tell you what Tommy said about that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just that he wasn't accepting, I guess, of that offer and that [00:56:00] it was best for him just to return to Oklahoma.
Mr. Kinsler: You mentioned the business closing, and we're specifically talking about Elm Grove Salsa Joe's.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: How'd you come to know that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just through talks that Tommy and Angela had, conversations, the tossing around of the idea of having to close the doors potentially because of business [00:56:30] not being what they had anticipated and not thriving the way that they had hoped.
Mr. Kinsler: You mentioned this, the porch talk, was that on August 23rd or thereabouts?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, that was on the 23rd.
Mr. Kinsler: Not long after that, your brother Chris passed away?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, two days later.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. How did he pass away?
Lisa Danielle B...: Overdose.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did Andrew know Chris?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: How did they know each other?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:57:00] My brother, Chris, at that time, was helping Andrew with a hunting patent. My brother Chris ran a business called Buck Stick, and my brother Chris had the capability to utilize patent attorneys, and he helped Andrew with a prototype of, [00:57:30] I believe it was a backpack of some sort for hunting purposes, to help him get that patent processed. And yeah, that was the relationship, I guess, in a business sense, but he was a friend. We were friends. We were all friends.
Mr. Kinsler: And how did Andrew react after Chris's death?
Lisa Danielle B...: [00:58:00] So, that happened on the 25th.
Speaker 3: Your Honor, may we approach, please?
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Yeah. [00:59:00] How did Andrew react to Chris's death?
Lisa Danielle B...: Concerned.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And subsequent to that, did the defendant leave again?
Lisa Danielle B...: I received contact from him the day after my brother passed to see if I could retrieve for him the prototype that my brother was shipping out for him to the patent attorney.
Mr. Kinsler: [00:59:30] Okay. And did you do that?
Lisa Danielle B...: I did.
Mr. Kinsler: And what did you do with the patent or the prototype when you retrieved it?
Lisa Danielle B...: I found the prototype in my brother's place of business for Buck Stick, and it was labeled, set to go out UPS. I was able to get that package and return it to Andrew on the 27th.
Mr. Kinsler: And what did Andrew do after that?
Lisa Danielle B...: He was [01:00:00] packed up, U-Haul packed, ready, ready to leave, but was waiting for that package.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And did he in fact leave?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did Andrew ever have a conversation about you, what his plans were for the smoker that he was taking to Oklahoma?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, not at that point in time.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did he ever talk with you about having plans to open a Salsa Joe's there?
Lisa Danielle B...: Not after all of that.
Mr. Kinsler: Well, I guess at any time.
Lisa Danielle B...: Oh, yes. Yeah.
Mr. Kinsler: Explain [01:00:30] that to the jury. What did the defendant tell you about his plans?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just that his duties were to operate and run the Salsa Joe's in Elm Grove for one year, and after one year, then leave to expand and open up Salsa Joe in his area from where he's at in Oklahoma, like Indian Reservation area.
Mr. Kinsler: Did he ever tell you how many stores or how many locations?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:01:00] Okay. Talked about the business, Elm Grove specifically, how it was doing in September, shortly before Tom's murder.
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay.
Mr. Kinsler: How would you describe the business at that point?
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:01:30] Business was still not good, even though all the attempts Tommy had trying to make it better, just things weren't working out in our favor.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. What was Tommy attempting to do?
Lisa Danielle B...: He, on weekends, would bring in a DJ to try to attract maybe a different crowd of people, which we did there for a couple weeks, maybe three weeks [01:02:00] time, and had more of a college crowd for a DJ night. And we would be very busy at the bar, but I believe that's kind of what carried Elm Grove until its closing, because the people who were coming in to eat had definitely declined.
Mr. Kinsler: Circling back to the conversation on [01:02:30] the porch, what was defendant's demeanor after that conversation with Tommy?
Lisa Danielle B...: Just very calm, collect, not too much emotion.
Mr. Kinsler: Subsequent to the porch conversation, did the defendant ever come to Salsa Joe's?
Lisa Danielle B...: No. Once he [01:03:00] left Salsa Joe's on the 23rd, that was the last day he was at Salsa Joe's.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Was it your understanding that he was no longer working there as a manager?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, that is correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Was it your understanding, was he still an investor in the business at that point?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was under my understanding that he was no longer that general manager.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Was Tom ever looking for another partner, another investor?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, he was.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:03:30] What timeframe was that taking place?
Lisa Danielle B...: That timeframe would've been more so after my brother Chris passed away in that three-week timeframe.
Mr. Kinsler: You mentioned Salsa Joe's Elm Grove closing. Are there being plans to close?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: What was your understanding of that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Of the understanding [01:04:00] of it closing?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes.
Lisa Danielle B...: From talks that we had, the understanding was that those doors would close once they returned back from their trip to Florida.
Mr. Kinsler: Whose trip to Florida?
Lisa Danielle B...: Tommy and Angela's.
Mr. Kinsler: And when was that supposed to take place?
Lisa Danielle B...: I'm unsure of departure, but I knew that they would be there for Angela's 50th birthday.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:04:30] And when was that going to be?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would've been September 23rd.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you recall, did Angela make any postings related to that trip on social media?
Lisa Danielle B...: She did post that she was seeking someone to dog sit.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Now I want to talk to you about September 20th, 2021. Did you go to Tommy and Angela's house?
Lisa Danielle B...: I did.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:05:00] About what time did you go?
Lisa Danielle B...: Around 11:00 in the morning.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And what were you there to do?
Lisa Danielle B...: Payroll with Angela.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Was Tommy present?
Lisa Danielle B...: He was not in the house.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Who, just you and Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: I believe there was a cleaning service there.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did they frequently have a cleaning service?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. This would've been a Monday?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Is that the day their cleaning service usually appears?
Lisa Danielle B...: I'm not sure.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. [01:05:30] Are the restaurants open on Mondays?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Is there nonetheless work to do on Mondays at the restaurant?
Lisa Danielle B...: Absolutely. I mean, smoker still needs loaded, all of that.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. How long would you have been with Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: Every bit of a couple of hours, probably until around 1:00 in the afternoon.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. How was her demeanor?
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:06:00] She was good.
PART 2 OF 13 ENDS [01:06:04]
Lisa Danielle B...: She was good.
Mr. Kinsler: And where do you go from there?
Lisa Danielle B...: Where did I go?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes.
Lisa Danielle B...: I went back to Bel Air.
Mr. Kinsler: Did you go home or did you go somewhere else?
Lisa Danielle B...: I went to my dad's house and then I picked my dad up and we then went to family friends down the street.
Mr. Kinsler: Subsequent to... So after leaving the house, did you talk to Tommy again that day [01:06:30] or talk to Tommy at all that day?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. Yes, I did.
Mr. Kinsler: When was that?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would've been, it was around 5:30. Tommy called to ask if my dad had made sauce for the pasta night that we were to have on Wednesday, which my dad replied yes, the sauce was made. And then Tommy said, "Well, hey, I'm going to bring 10 pound ground [01:07:00] meat to you tomorrow morning so dad can make some meatballs for it too." That was our conversation.
Mr. Kinsler: When you say pasta night, where is that supposed to be?
Lisa Danielle B...: Elm Grove.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Do you recall any time that day talking to Angela about upcoming events at Elm Grove?
Lisa Danielle B...: We had an upcoming event that was scheduled for a rehearsal dinner that we [01:07:30] were trying to figure out, okay, what's going to happen with this event in the case that we do close our doors. So we had talked about that, having to possibly move it to Belmont and to accommodate everyone for that rehearsal dinner at Belmont.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you have any idea how far out that rehearsal dinner was scheduled?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was coming up quick. It would've been fairly quick [01:08:00] had they arrived from Florida, probably within that next week.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember, was that when you were at Angela's house or was that on the phone? When did that conversation take place?
Lisa Danielle B...: We spoke of that both in conversation on the phone and in person.
Mr. Kinsler: And you had a phone conversation in the evening with Angela that night?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I did.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember when that took place?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, approximately 9:30.
Mr. Kinsler: And how long did you talk?
Lisa Danielle B...: We talked for approximately [01:08:30] 30 minutes from 9:30 until 10:00.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember what you talked about?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yep. We talked about my daughter. We talked about her being on homecoming court, my brother getting the vehicle that she was going to ride in the parade. We talked about family things. And then of course we talked about how things were going to operate after [01:09:00] they left for their trip, things that needed done.
Mr. Kinsler: How did that conversation end?
Lisa Danielle B...: That ended right at 10 o'clock and Angela said, "Hey, I got to go. I got to go. I got to go." That was the last thing before she got off the phone.
Mr. Kinsler: You mentioned that even if Salsa Joe's is closed on Monday, there's still work to be done like with the smoker. Who would've taken care of that at Elm Grove?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would've been [01:09:30] Tommy.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. So after you hang up the phone with Angela, did you ever speak to Tom or Angela again after that?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, I did not.
Mr. Kinsler: The following day, September 21st, 2021.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: How did you first learn something was wrong?
Lisa Danielle B...: I learned through text from a good friend that texted roughly 7:20 in the morning and the text just stated, " [01:10:00] Lisa, I'm so sorry, but I heard that Tommy and Angela's house may be on fire."
Mr. Kinsler: What did you do?
Lisa Danielle B...: Panicked. I jumped out of bed. I called Angela's phone. I called Tommy's phone with no pickup. My husband who was home, I said, "We got to go. Come on." And we were [01:10:30] then scrambling to get clothes on and get out the door as quickly as we could to get to the location.
Mr. Kinsler: And did you ultimately get to their house?
Lisa Danielle B...: I did.
Mr. Kinsler: And what did you find there?
Lisa Danielle B...: I found the house to be surrounded by response vehicles, fire, sheriffs, yellow taped everywhere.
Mr. Kinsler: And [01:11:00] subsequent to that, were you alerted that they had died?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Subsequent to that, did you wind up talking to law enforcement?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Was it more than one time that day?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Would you have gone down to the sheriff's office to speak with someone?
Lisa Danielle B...: I did.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember who that was?
Lisa Danielle B...: That was with Detective Cruse at that time.
Mr. Kinsler: Did you subsequently [01:11:30] go with Detective Cruse to Salsa Joe's, Elm Grove?
Lisa Danielle B...: I'm sorry, I didn't hear the whole...
Mr. Kinsler: Sometime that day, did you also go to Salsa Joe's and meet Detective Cruse?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay.
Lisa Danielle B...: Detective Cruse, and there was also two other deputies with him.
Mr. Kinsler: When was that during the day?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would've been more evening hours, roughly six in the evening.
Mr. Kinsler: On that day, after you find out, at some juncture, did you reach [01:12:00] out to the defendant?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember how you did that?
Lisa Danielle B...: By phone. First would've been around 10:00, 11,00 in the morning, and then with a return call in the afternoon.
Mr. Kinsler: So 10:00, 11:00 in the morning, how did you reach out to him? Do you call?
Lisa Danielle B...: I called.
Mr. Kinsler: And did you get a response?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, I got voicemail.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And then sometime [01:12:30] later you mentioned a return call?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And do you remember when that took place?
Lisa Danielle B...: That took place anytime... It was between two and four, roughly.
Mr. Kinsler: What was your phone number at the time?
Lisa Danielle B...: My phone number? 740-310-7377.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:13:00] When you had that follow-up conversation with the defendant, did you inform him that Tom and Lisa had passed?
Lisa Danielle B...: Tom and Angela?
Mr. Kinsler: Tom and Angela, excuse me.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And how did he respond?
Lisa Danielle B...: He responded just like, "Oh my gosh, [01:13:30] I'm sorry."
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. In the time after Tom and Angela's death, did you continue communicating with the defendant?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, at times.
Mr. Kinsler: What would you talk about?
Lisa Danielle B...: The first phone call, I believe after everything, was [01:14:00] just to check on me and ask how I was doing after having both brothers and Angela pass.
Mr. Kinsler: Subsequent to that, did you ever talk with the defendant about the investigation?
Lisa Danielle B...: Not about specifics that were happening within the investigation, but more so [01:14:30] my intuitions and feelings about who may have been involved.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. You ever expressed who you though might have done it to the defendant?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And how did he respond to that?
Lisa Danielle B...: He responded, because obviously he knew the same people I did and whether he agreed or he didn't, that could... Yeah, that could definitely be something there or...
Mr. Kinsler: [01:15:00] What happened to Salsa Joe's Elm Grove after the murders?
Lisa Danielle B...: The doors closed.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And why would that have been? Obviously Tom and Angela were deceased.
Lisa Danielle B...: Because of their deaths.
Mr. Kinsler: Were they the owners or the lessees of that property?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, they rented.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And what about Salsa Joe's Belmont?
Lisa Danielle B...: They rented that as well.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did it also close immediately after their deaths?
Lisa Danielle B...: It did for [01:15:30] a brief time until I then reopened it, put under a different name.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And how long did that take? How long after their deaths was it before you reopened?
Lisa Danielle B...: So from September 21st to my partner and I's grand opening on December 7th.
Mr. Kinsler: To your knowledge, did the defendant ever attempt to retrieve any property from Salsa Joe's Elm Grove?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: To your knowledge, [01:16:00] did the defendant ever ask for his share of proceeds or any assets from the Elm Grove location?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: [inaudible 01:16:57]. [01:16:30] Your Honor, may I approach the witness?
Judge: Yes. [01:17:00] Mr. Kinsler, do you have an exhibit with you?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes, Your Honor. I'm going to show her several photos and ask her if she recognizes those, and then I'll publish them on the screen if that's all right.
Judge: All right. And Mr. Shamansky, do you have advanced notice of what these are?
Mr. Shamansky: Yes, Your Honor. We have no objection.
Judge: All right. Thank you. Yes, sir.
Mr. Kinsler: Sorry.
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:17:30] Oh, you're fine.
Mr. Kinsler: [inaudible 01:17:35].
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay.
Mr. Kinsler: I'm going to show you... I'm going to show you several of these and we'll ask you if you recognize them. Do you recognize State's Exhibit 135A?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And... You ready?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I recognize it even upside down.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135B, do [01:18:00] you also recognize that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135C?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135G?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And State's Exhibit 135NN?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And [01:18:30] State's Exhibit 135RRR?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Excuse me. State's Exhibit 135AAAA?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And State's Exhibit 135RRRR?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Are these all true and accurate depictions of Tom and Angela's home?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Your Honor, with the court's permission, I'm going to publish those exhibits and go through them with her for the jury.
Judge: [01:19:00] Mr. Shamansky?
Mr. Shamansky: No objection, sir.
Judge: You may proceed.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you, Your Honor. [01:19:30] Publishing what's been marked as State's Exhibit 135A. Do you recognize that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: What are we looking at?
Lisa Danielle B...: So that would've been, you know, the front of Tommy and Angela's home on Trail's End.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay.
Lisa Danielle B...: The garage.
Mr. Kinsler: I'm sorry.
Lisa Danielle B...: Obviously open.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:20:00] Whose truck was that?
Lisa Danielle B...: That's Tommy's truck.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135B, do you recognize that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Backyard area.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. State's Exhibit 135C?
Lisa Danielle B...: Same, backyard area.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Do you see a back door on the porch there?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Tommy and Angela lock that back door?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was opened a lot because of their dogs.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:20:30] Okay. Was it common that it was unlocked?
Lisa Danielle B...: Was it common? Did you say common?
Mr. Kinsler: Was it common that it was unlocked?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. You mentioned they have pets.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Does this lead out to...
Lisa Danielle B...: The dogs were constantly wanting in and out.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Was this a fenced in area for them?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, it was.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135G, do you recognize this?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: I don't know if you can make it out on your image, but the window appears to be broken or open [01:21:00] that's right by that rocking chair.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do see it now.
Mr. Kinsler: Was that the condition of that window when you visited Angela to do payroll?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, it was not.
Mr. Kinsler: Was it... What do you recall, was it open or closed when you were there?
Lisa Danielle B...: I mean, no broken windows, no damage to anything on the porch.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135NN. I want to direct your attention to the blue bags.
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:21:30] Okay.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you recognize those?
Lisa Danielle B...: I do.
Mr. Kinsler: What are those?
Lisa Danielle B...: Those would be the bank bags that we spoke of earlier.
Mr. Kinsler: So when you say bank bags, are those server bags or are those something else?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, those are transport bags.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Is that how you described Tommy would move money from the restaurant home to Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135RRR, [01:22:00] do you recognize that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do.
Mr. Kinsler: And what is that?
Lisa Danielle B...: That's Angela's cell phone.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135AAAA. Do you also recognize that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do.
Mr. Kinsler: And what are those?
Lisa Danielle B...: Those would be transport bags that... Yeah, the change and the money wrappers could have been from... There would also be like a petty cash.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:22:30] Okay. And 135JJJJ, do you recognize that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: What is that?
Lisa Danielle B...: That's the interior of Tommy's truck.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. You mentioned that he sometimes has cash in his truck. Where would that be?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would be in that center console area that pulls up and the money bag would be tucked in there.
Mr. Kinsler: Center console, meaning between the two seats?
Lisa Danielle B...: In between the two seats, yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Perfect. It's okay. [01:23:30] Do you recall the defendant ever telling you about going to Columbus with your brother?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Tell us that, what he told you.
Lisa Danielle B...: My brother would make trips to Columbus, business trips or trips to get restaurant equipment, so forth. Sometimes it would be trips to an establishment called Tony's, which was a restaurant.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:24:00] Did he ever specifically tell you about a time... The defendant ever tell you specifically about a time that he traveled there with your brother and your brother had large amounts of cash on him?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. There was one specific time that he shared that.
Mr. Kinsler: What happened on... What did the defendant tell you about that trip?
Lisa Danielle B...: That it was one of those trips to Tony's restaurant.
Mr. Kinsler: Did the defendant represent to you how much money Tommy had with him on that trip?
Lisa Danielle B...: Not an exact amount, just a large amount.
Mr. Kinsler: [01:24:30] Okay. Did he say what the money was for?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did the defendant ever suggest to you who he thought might have murdered Tommy and Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: Did he ever suggest... I'm sorry, what was that again?
Mr. Kinsler: Did the defendant ever suggest to you who he thought Tommy and Angela... Who might have murdered Tommy and Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: No one specifically. It kind of changed [01:25:00] as the months went by and I had different feelings. At one point in time, he shared with me that he had heard it was related with my brother Chris's death.
Mr. Kinsler: Did he ever suggest to you that there was the... The defendant ever suggest to you that it was...
Mr. Shamansky: I object, your honor. Leading.
Judge: [01:25:30] Your response?
Mr. Kinsler: I'll withdraw that question, Your Honor, and rephrase. Did he ever make any suggestions to you about who would've been behind it?
Lisa Danielle B...: He was very fearful of, I guess, mob activity or people like that.
Mr. Kinsler: He being who?
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:26:00] Andrew.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did he connect that to your brother's death?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. I think fearful.
Mr. Kinsler: No further questions. Thank you, Your Honor.
Mr. Shamansky: Judge, may I approach one second?
Judge: Yes.
PART 3 OF 13 ENDS [01:39:04]
Speaker 6: [01:42:00] Okay.
All rise.
Judge: Please everyone [01:42:30] be seated.
All right, we are back on the record. Ms. is it Balog?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Judge: I'm going to remind you you're still under oath. Okay.
Mr. Shamansky, do you wish to undertake any cross-examination?
Mr. Shamansky: I do. Thank you, Your Honor.
Judge: You may proceed.
Mr. Shamansky: Thank you, sir.
Good morning.
Lisa Danielle B...: Good morning.
Mr. Shamansky: So I naturally recognize [01:43:00] the difficulty of this situation, right? And the jury has heard that you've lost your brother, your sister-in-law, and your other brother all within the span of a very short period of time, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. As well as three years previous to that, my other sister-in-law, a year and a half after that, my mother, and then within the investigation, my dad.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. And through all of that, you've done your level best [01:43:30] to persevere and take care of your two kids and your husband, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: I have three children.
Mr. Shamansky: Or I'm sorry, three. Get your business back up and running, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Do your level best to put one foot in front of the other?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: All right.
Now, I'm not looking to dwell on the unseemly or the uncomfortable. We don't need to worry about that, okay?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: So just take a deep breath and ask you just a few specific questions about your knowledge. And in reviewing the interviews that you had with law enforcement officials, there was a great [01:44:00] deal of focus on your brother's behavior, correct? When I say your brother, I'm talking about Tom.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And let's start with these trips to Columbus of which you were aware and which you discussed. And in fact, ma'am, your husband was present for these interviews as well, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: That is correct.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. And so it was no secret that your brother Tom handled really large quantities of cash that didn't go to the [01:44:30] bank, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: I was not aware of that fact until after their deaths that it did not go to the bank.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. And you became aware that there were some, I think you said in your interviews, maybe up to $200,000 that may have been contained at his house, right? Or kept at his house?
Lisa Danielle B...: I don't know that I went with a figure that high.
Mr. Shamansky: Well, at one point you said 100,000.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. It was a hundred and beyond, within that vicinity.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And [01:45:00] you were asked by Mr. Kinsler about flashing cash and having several thousand dollars in his pocket, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And you indicated also that when you were interviewed by Detective Oller, that oftentimes your brother would behave in a way [01:45:30] that wasn't in keeping with maintaining a good faithful relationship with his wife, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. Trips to Columbus, Ohio, to Tony Scartz's restaurant, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Gone for days on end, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: For these particular trips?
Mr. Shamansky: Particular trips or even on instances that didn't relate to those particular trips.
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:46:00] The only time I would be aware of him being gone for days would be for those specific trips.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. And so you came to understand, of course, that your brother was, I hate to say involved, but at least hanging out with people that you may not have thought it appropriate for him to associate. Is that a fair statement?
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:46:30] My brother hung out with a lot of different people from different classes and walks of life. Did I see any one particular person? I can't say that I did.
Mr. Shamansky: So when you say you didn't see anybody in particular, right? That's because you were not hanging around him 24 hours a day, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: I wasn't around him 24 hours a day.
Mr. Shamansky: Right. You were very busy with your own life helping [01:47:00] with the restaurant to the extent you could, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: That would be correct.
Mr. Shamansky: And so you indicated at one point that your brother was out of control, a lot of alcohol usage, et cetera, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: I saw more of a downward spiral after the passing of my brother.
Mr. Shamansky: Right. After Chris' death, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And tell the [01:47:30] jury again that date, please.
Lisa Danielle B...: My brother Chris passed on August 25th, 2021.
Mr. Shamansky: And during the interview that you had with Detective Oller, there were questions asked about Tommy's character and it was indicated that he wasn't a straight and narrow guy. Do you remember those statements?
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:48:00] Yes, I do.
Mr. Shamansky: And there was some reference to a congressman, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And so this was information that you, of course, conveyed to law enforcement, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Which information are you speaking of that I conveyed?
Mr. Shamansky: Well, for example, you indicated to Detective Cruz that everyone was always asking, "Is your brother married?" Remember that? That Q&A that [01:48:30] you had?
Lisa Danielle B...: Oh yeah. I mean, lots of females would ask of that.
Mr. Shamansky: Right. And did he wear a wedding ring? The one you got on your finger, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Some days.
Mr. Shamansky: Yeah.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: So he wore a ring, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Some days, but a lot of days, no, because he was in the kitchen working. I'm the same way, working in a kitchen, I don't wear my rings every day 'cause my hands are in food all day long.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. So some days he had a ring on and you indicated [01:49:00] that he always carried a lot of cash, always had a lot of cash in his pocket and cash in his truck, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Always, I don't know. I don't know of always, but yes, I have seen absolutely large amounts of cash in his truck.
Mr. Shamansky: Well, in 20 minutes and 26 seconds, you indicated that he always had a lot of cash in his pocket.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, always in his pocket.
Mr. Shamansky: Right. And then indicated that the money in his pocket, he would flash a lot to be truthful with [01:49:30] you. Does that make sense, that statement, or do I have that incorrect?
Lisa Danielle B...: I don't believe I ever said he would flash money.
Mr. Shamansky: Oh, I'm sorry. You're right. That was your husband that said that. I apologize.
You then said, "Listen, I've been around him where he's had a shit ton of money on him in cash. I'm talking upwards of $250,000 in cash." Do you recall that statement?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, I never recalled making that statement.
Mr. Shamansky: If I showed it to you, would it maybe refresh your memory without us having to listen to it?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yeah. I would like to see that. Yeah.
Mr. Shamansky: May I approach [01:50:00] the witness, Your Honor?
Judge: Yes.
And what would that exhibit number be?
Mr. Shamansky: Your Honor, it's not an exhibit. It's just a transcript reference. If I need to use it, if Mrs. Balog doesn't remember, I can mark it and we can play it for her as well outside the presence. May I approach?
Judge: Yeah.
Mr. Shamansky: So right here.
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay.
Mr. Shamansky: [01:50:30] Go ahead take a look at the context and see if it helps you remember. If not, we can play it for you.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yeah. I mean, I recall saying that he always had a shit ton of cash on person.
Mr. Shamansky: Yeah. And to be fair, when you, at one point you opined it was 100,000, another point, apparently maybe you said 250,000. It's fair to say you didn't sit around and count your brother's cash at his house, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Never.
Mr. Shamansky: You really were just spitballing or ballparking [01:51:00] it, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Mm-hmm.
Mr. Shamansky: Just a lot of money for a normal everyday human being to keep outside of a safe, secure banking depository, right?
Judge: There wasn't an answer.
Mr. Shamansky: Oh, I'm sorry.
Lisa Danielle B...: Oh, I'm sorry. What was that?
Judge: Can you repeat the question, Mr. Shamansky?
Mr. Shamansky: Yes, Your Honor. It's fair to say, based on your observations, that whether it was 50,000, 100,000, 150,000, we're talking about large sums of money that people within your [01:51:30] neighborhood wouldn't ever keep at home, they would keep in a bank, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: I guess it's dependent on the person. As I said, growing up, I lived in a household.
Mr. Shamansky: Yeah, I heard that. Your brother and your ... It was a learned behavior, you said.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Now, you talked a great deal about your business experience and your involvement with the business, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And you understand as a business person, as you run your restaurant right now, that [01:52:00] cash proceeds are used as operating revenue, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: That's correct.
Mr. Shamansky: And employees are not paid in cash, they're paid with checks, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: That's correct.
Mr. Shamansky: And in order to maintain a stream of revenue for a restaurant, you take your cash proceeds and you put them squarely in the bank either every day or every other day, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: You wouldn't leave $100,000 lying around your residence, would you?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, I don't have that kind of money to leave around my house, but-
Mr. Shamansky: I'm asking hypothetically.
Lisa Danielle B...: Hypothetically?
Mr. Shamansky: Yes, [01:52:30] ma'am.
Mr. Kinsler: Objection, Your Honor.
Mr. Shamansky: Well, the ...
Judge: Let's approach.
You may proceed.
Mr. Shamansky: Thank you. [01:53:30] So to be clear, in your restaurant, and tell me the name of it again.
Lisa Danielle B...: I don't own it. I just manage, [01:54:00] run it, do the payroll and all of that, but ...
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. Your current endeavor, your current business, if you had receipts in a week of $100,000, you would probably take them to the bank, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: If it is money that was generated from the business, yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Was your brother generating cash from other businesses?
Lisa Danielle B...: I mean, the two locations and as far as any other cash that may have been there, I don't know if it could have been from [01:54:30] other sources.
Mr. Shamansky: Well, what other potential sources of cash ... Did your brother own other businesses?
Lisa Danielle B...: No, but Angela cashed out a 401k, a large amount of money.
Mr. Shamansky: Well, she used that money to purchase the home.
Lisa Danielle B...: No, the house wasn't completely paid for.
Mr. Shamansky: So hold on a second. Your testimony is that Angela Strussion liquidated her retirement and put that money into currency?
Lisa Danielle B...: [01:55:00] That ... I don't know what they did with that money. That wasn't a discussion that I had with them.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay.
Lisa Danielle B...: I know a lot of it went towards the business and a partial amount went to the house.
Mr. Shamansky: You don't recall advising that she, meaning Angela, cashed out her 401k in order to [01:55:30] pay for their home?
Lisa Danielle B...: I wouldn't have known or been privy to that information as to where that money went.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay.
So you recall a time, and help me if I'm mistaken about this, that a bunch of hoodlums showed up at your brother's home and were trashing [01:56:00] the ride, trashing the yard and screaming, "This is for Tom," and everybody was going crazy?
Lisa Danielle B...: There was that incident, and that happened in between my brother Chris' death and Tommy and Angela's. I don't know that I ever used the term hoodlum. It doesn't sound like a term I would use, but I may have said hoodlum.
Mr. Shamansky: You know somebody that worked for your brother by the name of Jill?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: [01:56:30] Jill West?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I do.
Mr. Shamansky: And what'd she do at the restaurant?
Lisa Danielle B...: She was a server.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. And is she still employed with you?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Shamansky: You were interviewed and the detectives asked you about your brother's night habits, right? You recall that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And to be fair, I'm looking at a summary and I want you to correct me if I'm wrong, but law enforcement indicated that you stated that sometimes [01:57:00] Tom would not come home and Angela would call looking for him.
Lisa Danielle B...: That's correct.
Mr. Shamansky: And you stated that Tom was getting ... that this was getting worse after your brother passed, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, it definitely was.
Mr. Shamansky: And you indicated that your brother became very scattered when the Elm Grove, West Virginia location opened, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. More so in that timeframe, but more so after the death of my brother.
Mr. Shamansky: And ma'am, [01:57:30] and I'm not sure that I have this right because again, I'm reading from a summary, but you advised that your brother had indicated that he was being blackmailed, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Not to myself, but to my dad.
Mr. Shamansky: Right. And you also indicated that Tom was obsessed with getting investors for the Elm Grove location for the last two weeks of his life, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Well, two to three weeks.
Mr. Shamansky: And you [01:58:00] used the word obsessed, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: It was more ... Yeah, it was obsessive. It was ...
Mr. Shamansky: And so we know, based on your testimony, that your brother convinced Mr. Griffin to become an investor, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: From my knowledge, but I never knew how much was invested.
Mr. Shamansky: I'm not asking you about that.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: That information can ... The jury can learn about that if it's admitted.
Lisa Danielle B...: Okay.
Mr. Shamansky: [01:58:30] And then you indicated for the last two weeks of his life, he was still talking with people and trying to convince them to also park their money with him in the Elm Grove location, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Now, you were asked about DJ rage night at the Elm Grove location, and so what we're talking [01:59:00] about here is your brother and Angela collectively trying to draw in business, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: In order to keep the establishment operational, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Correct.
Mr. Shamansky: And you indicated that a different crowd started to come to the Elm Grove restaurant, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Including narcotics traffickers that always had money and tipped [01:59:30] well, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: I can't say that I knew that to be factual. I never saw anyone do narcotics, but to speculate-
Mr. Shamansky: Well, and correct me if I'm wrong.
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, I would say that would be the type of person that ...
Mr. Shamansky: Well, you even went so far as to name a couple of individuals that were narcotics traffickers, one named Mook and another named Sherman, indicating that they're drug dealers, they always play the gambling machines all day and they would tip really well, [02:00:00] right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes. Those were two that I had come to know because they became regulars on that night.
Mr. Shamansky: Can I have one second, Your Honor?
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: [02:00:30] Your Honor, that's all we have. Thank you, ma'am.
Lisa Danielle B...: You're welcome.
Judge: Mr. Kinsler, any redirect?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes, Your Honor. Thank you.
Lisa, you were asked on cross [02:01:00] that, talking about investigators about Tom not always being faithful to Angela, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Is that all something that the defendant would've known?
Lisa Danielle B...: Whether or not he was?
Mr. Kinsler: Whether or not Tom was unfaithful to Angela.
Mr. Shamansky: Your Honor, how would she know what somebody else knows?
Mr. Kinsler: I can rephrase the question, Your Honor.
Judge: Okay. Rephrase it.
Mr. Kinsler: Did you and the defendant ever have conversations about Tom [02:01:30] being unfaithful to Angela?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Do you remember when that took place?
Lisa Danielle B...: Maybe within the timeframe between May and June.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Subsequent to the murders?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: You had conversations with the defendant, correct?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember ever having conversations in those talks ever talking to him about Tom's infidelity?
Lisa Danielle B...: No.
Mr. Kinsler: [02:02:00] Did you and the defendant ever talk about the possible narcotics trafficking at the Elm Grove location being related to Tom's death?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, as well as other avenues of ...
Mr. Kinsler: Was the defendant suggesting that that was a possibility to you?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Did he ever suggest anything else could have led to Tom's death?
Lisa Danielle B...: [02:02:30] I think that was the main, yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Did he ever suggest to you that it was a jealous former lover of Tom's or a jealous husband or a jealous boyfriend?
Lisa Danielle B...: I don't recall.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay.
[02:03:00] Subsequent to the murders, did you and the defendant ever have a conversation about that episode where someone was ... hoodlums, I think is what Mr. Shamansky used the term that they did donuts near their property. Did you ever talk about that after the murders?
Lisa Danielle B...: I may have shared that information, yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Did he ever suggest to you that that could have been the party responsible for Tom and Angela's death?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, possibility.
Mr. Kinsler: [02:03:30] You were asked by Mr. Shamansky about there being occasion where there might be a hundred grand or more in the house. Do you remember that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Is that something that other people would've known?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. The defendant having lived in the home for a while, would he have the opportunity to know that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay.
Was it kind of commonly understood amongst people, at least surrounding the business, [02:04:00] employees of either Belmont or Elm Grove, Salsa Joe's, would they have all known Tom to keep those large sums of cash?
Lisa Danielle B...: I wouldn't say everyone knew that.
Mr. Kinsler: Would some of them have known that?
Lisa Danielle B...: Some of them.
Mr. Kinsler: No further questions, Your Honor. Thank you.
Judge: Mr. Shamansky, any additional cross-examination?
Mr. Shamansky: One second, Your Honor.
Your Honor, I'm sorry. Ma'am, just to be clear, this [02:04:30] bit about Mook and Sherman, this was information that you gave to the government independent of Mr. Griffin, right? I mean, this is knowledge that you had, that you shared with the investigators, right?
Lisa Danielle B...: Yes, at that time, and asking of the people who were surrounding at that moment, those were the two that I could name by name.
Mr. Shamansky: I understand. That's all I have. Thank you, sir.
Judge: All right.
Mr. Kinsler, may this witness be excused?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes, Your Honor. Thank you.
Judge: All right.
And you may step down. Thank you.
Lisa Danielle B...: Thank you.
Judge: Is the [02:05:00] state prepared to call their next witness?
Speaker 4: Yes, Your Honor. State calls Pam McKim.
Pam McKim?
Speaker 5: Yes.
Speaker 7: You need the stipulated [inaudible 02:05:36] I can help you with that.
Speaker 5: I'm going to show [02:05:30] the Belmont Savings Bank, the actual [inaudible 02:05:42] based on 100% stipulated. [inaudible 02:05:45]
Speaker 4: Do you swear testimony about to give the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth so help you God?
Pam McKim: Yes, I do.
Speaker 4: Have a seat.
Judge: Ms. McKim, do you objet to being filmed?
Pam McKim: No, that's okay.
Judge: All right.
State [02:06:00] may proceed when it's ready.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Judge.
Good morning, ma'am.
Pam McKim: Good morning.
Speaker 4: Can you tell us your name, please?
Pam McKim: Pam McKim.
Speaker 4: All right. And Ms. McKim, what do you do for a living?
Pam McKim: I am a VP at a business development for Belmont Savings Bank.
Speaker 4: [02:06:30] Belmont Savings Bank is a local banking institution here in Belmont County?
Pam McKim: Yes, it is.
Speaker 4: Okay.
And how long have you held that role?
Pam McKim: Oh, I've been in banking for over 40 some years. I've held that role for about seven.
Speaker 4: Okay. So you've been at Belmont Savings Bank seven years, so 2019, roughly?
Pam McKim: I'm sorry, 2017, so it's longer than that.
Speaker 4: Nine years?
Pam McKim: Yeah, nine years.
Speaker 4: All right. And you said you have 40 years [02:07:00] banking experience?
Pam McKim: Yes, I do.
Speaker 4: What other jobs or positions have you held for what institutions?
Pam McKim: Security National Bank. I was a new accounts, universal banker is what they call them now. I was a branch manager at Premier Bank and at ... I've worked at eight banks. I went through eight buyouts, so there's several [02:07:30] of them. So I've been a branch manager. I've been a new accounts person. I've been in the community involvement area. I teach financial literacy and I do business development.
Speaker 4: In your current role at Belmont Savings Bank, what all do you handle?
Pam McKim: What I handle mostly is business development. I go out and meet new businesses, [02:08:00] meet people, build relationships and help them with their banking needs. I also do financial literacy now and community relations.
Speaker 4: Do you know Tom and Angela Strussion?
Pam McKim: I did, yes.
Speaker 4: And how did you come to know them?
Pam McKim: Through actually banking and through the chamber, St. Clairsville Chamber and through Rotary.
Speaker 4: [02:08:30] Okay. And what was your relationship like with Tom and Angela prior, let's say prior to March of 2021?
Pam McKim: I was their banker. I helped them with banking. I also had Tommy come and cater our Rotary dinners, and I also ... He did the barfs for us at the St. Clairsville Chamber. I was the president at the time, yes.
Speaker 4: You had a business relationship?
Pam McKim: Yes.
Speaker 4: Did [02:09:00] you consider yourself friends?
Pam McKim: Yeah. I mean, not like we would go out or anything, but yes. Yes, friends, yes.
Speaker 4: Okay.
At a certain point, did they come to you with a third individual about opening a new bank account?
Pam McKim: Yes, they did.
Speaker 4: Do you recall the name of their business that they were using?
Pam McKim: Well, Salsa Joe's was a big one, but it was AJ Holdings, [02:09:30] I think.
Speaker 4: Okay. All right.
As a part of your role with the bank, is your understanding that the Belmont County Sheriff's Office sent the bank some subpoenas for some records?
Pam McKim: That's correct.
Speaker 4: Okay. And the bank provided those records, correct?
Pam McKim: Yes.
Speaker 4: Is it your understanding that the bank provided the entirety of the account for AJS Holdings?
Pam McKim: That's my ... Yes, that's my understanding, yes.
Speaker 4: And there's some additional documentation [02:10:00] as well about how that business started and some developments along the way.
Pam McKim: Correct.
Speaker 4: Fair to say?
Pam McKim: Yes.
Speaker 4: Okay. If I showed you that, the bank records, you believe you'd recognize them?
Pam McKim: Yes, I do.
Speaker 4: Okay. And for the record, these are regularly kept records that the bank would be in custody of?
Pam McKim: That's correct, yes.
Mr. Shamansky: These records are all stipulated, Your Honor.
Speaker 4: Judge, at this time, I would ask permission to display State's Exhibit 155.
Mr. Shamansky: No objection, [02:10:30] sir.
Judge: You may proceed.
Pam McKim: Right here. Thank you.
Speaker 4: Okay. Ms. McKim, do you recognize what we're looking at here, State's Exhibit 155?
Pam McKim: Yes.
Speaker 4: Okay. And we have, upper left-hand corner, we have the name of the LLC, correct?
Pam McKim: Correct.
Speaker 4: And what is that name?
Pam McKim: That's AJ Holdings, LLC, [02:11:00] Thomas D. Strussion and Angela Jess Strussion.
Speaker 4: And you said AJ Holdings, looked like AJS?
Pam McKim: S. I'm sorry. AJS.
Speaker 4: Okay. All right. And if we're looking at this statement, do you believe this to be the first statement when this account opened?
Pam McKim: Yes, because it starts out as zero beginning balance.
Speaker 4: Okay.
And I'm going to show you State's Exhibit 155A. Okay?
Pam McKim: Mm-hmm.
Speaker 4: I believe the first page [02:11:30] looks like just an email from the bank's attorney?
Pam McKim: Yes.
Speaker 4: Responding to the subpoena?
Pam McKim: That's correct.
Speaker 4: Fair to say? All right. And if I come down to, this is page three, I believe. What are we looking at here?
Pam McKim: You're actually looking at a signature card, which then shows you who are owners or authorized signers of an account.
Speaker 4: Okay. And is there a date on this document?
Pam McKim: Yes. Three ... You want to tell you?
Speaker 4: Yes, go ahead.
Pam McKim: 3/11/2021.
Speaker 4: All right. So to [02:12:00] your knowledge, is that the date this account was opened?
PART 4 OF 13 ENDS [02:12:04]
Speaker 8: ... 21.
Mr. Vavra: All right. So to your knowledge, is that the date this account was opened?
Speaker 8: To my knowledge.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Do you recall who all came in to sign these documents?
Speaker 8: Yes. All three of them.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. You say all three of them. We talked about Tom and Angela. Who was the third person?
Speaker 8: Andrew.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Andrew, can you tell us his last name?
Speaker 8: Griffin.
Mr. Vavra: All right. So were you physically present with Mr. Griffin?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. All right. Can you tell us what kind of account this is?
Speaker 8: It is [02:12:30] a checking account.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Business checking?
Speaker 8: Business checking account, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Can you tell us, based on your understanding in these documents, who the owner or owners of the account is or are?
Speaker 8: On this form, it says it's an LLC. It's not the actual copy of the LLC. This right here is showing you the authorized signers of the account.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Who were the authorized signers?
Speaker 8: Tommy... I'm sorry. [02:13:00] Thomas Strussion, Angela Strussion, and Andrew Griffin.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. All right. If I come down to the next page of this document, what are we looking at here?
Speaker 8: This is telling you ownership signatures, so it is telling you their relationships.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And can you kind of elaborate on what the relationships are?
Speaker 8: Yes. Let's see here. This one, this is Andrew's and he is an authorized signer.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Would he have been considered an [02:13:30] owner of this account?
Speaker 8: No, he would not.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So that AJS Holdings, is that the owner?
Speaker 8: That is actually, yes. The LLC will tell you more on that.
Mr. Vavra: And would you have been provided with a copy of the operating agreement or any...
Speaker 8: Yes, we would at that time. We require that for opening.
Mr. Vavra: Next page of this document, can you tell us what we're looking at here?
Speaker 8: This is actually the authorization resolution for the limited liability, [02:14:00] which is AJS Holdings.
Mr. Vavra: And again, designating the authorized signers, it looks like?
Speaker 8: Yes, that's correct.
Mr. Vavra: And all three at that time were authorized signers?
Speaker 8: That is correct.
Mr. Vavra: What does it mean to be an authorized signer?
Speaker 8: That means that you can actually write checks. You can call and get information on the account. As you see, you're going to see three columns on here, and... I'm sorry, we're not there yet, but actually this will tell you what all signers are allowed to do. At [02:14:30] this time showing this, it says that all of them had all authorities to the account.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. The next page of our document, can you make that out?
Speaker 8: I can make that out, yes.
Mr. Vavra: What is that?
Speaker 8: That's a driver's license of Oklahoma.
Mr. Vavra: Do you know whose?
Speaker 8: Andrew's.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And this next page, do you know what we're looking at here?
Speaker 8: That's a risk assessment and they do those on everybody [02:15:00] that opens up an account. A risk assessment's making sure that social security numbers, driver's license, all that is correctly the person sitting in front of you.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And this appears to be for Mr. Griffin?
Speaker 8: That is correct.
Mr. Vavra: And were there any issues as far as you can tell?
Speaker 8: No.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. What are we looking at this page?
Speaker 8: It's just telling you that the input address date is different than [02:15:30] where we actually live right now because his driver's license was Oklahoma.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And is this a continuation of that same page?
Speaker 8: Yes. Such as birth dates, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Same thing here?
Speaker 8: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And then what are we looking at here?
Speaker 8: This is an application for a debit card for Andrew.
Mr. Vavra: And do you recall being with him when this was filled out?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Did he receive a debit card for [02:16:00] the business?
Speaker 8: Actually, it would've been mailed to him at that time.
Mr. Vavra: Okay.
Speaker 8: Yes. So yeah, he didn't that day.
Mr. Vavra: And this page here, what are we looking at here?
Speaker 8: This right here is on our computer. It shows us a customer relationship profile. So this is on everybody. It gives you your address, your basic information like birthdate, email, phone numbers, all [02:16:30] that information.
Mr. Vavra: All right. So this was on March 11th, 2021?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And did the parties involved contribute funds to the account on that date?
Speaker 8: On that date, as far as I can remember, one of them contributed at that time.
Mr. Vavra: Do you remember which one?
Speaker 8: It was Tommy and Angela.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And do you remember how they contributed?
Speaker 8: [02:17:00] Cash.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And do you remember the amount?
Speaker 8: I remember the amount as 20,000.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Could it have been more possibly?
Speaker 8: It could have been more.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Why did... Withdraw that. At a certain point, did Mr. Griffin make a contribution?
Speaker 8: When he was asked for the... To make the deposit, he said he didn't have it at that time. So at that time I asked them, "Do you still want to put [02:17:30] him on or do you want to add him at a later date?" Because you can always update and remove people from accounts. And so I was talking to Tommy and Angela and they looked at each other for a while and they said yes to go ahead and put him on.
Mr. Vavra: Do you recall, did it take long for him to come in with his contribution?
Speaker 8: I'm not sure of the date on that, but I would say it'd been a couple days.
Mr. Schamansky: Object. If she's not sure, Your Honor.
Speaker 8: I'm not sure.
Mr. Schamansky: No reason to guess.
Speaker 8: Okay.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. All right. Well, let's-
Judge Berhalter: Do you have [02:18:00] a response?
Mr. Vavra: I'll withdraw the question, Judge.
Judge Berhalter: All right.
Mr. Vavra: Turning back to the bank statement that we looked at before, State's Exhibit 155.
Speaker 8: Right.
Mr. Vavra: You had mentioned this was the first statement for the account because the initial balance is zero.
Speaker 8: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Can you see that here in this corner?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And we see a deposit here on March 11th?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And how much is that?
Speaker 8: 80,000.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Is it your understanding that there [02:18:30] was... Withdraw that. Do you know how Mr. Griffin made his first contribution?
Speaker 8: I do not.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. If I showed you documentation from a checking account, could you identify it?
Speaker 8: I could identify on the back. I'd have to see it first.
Mr. Vavra: Judge, showing the witness State's Exhibit 137BBBB.
Judge Berhalter: Mr. Schamansky?
Mr. Schamansky: This is a check from her bank, right?
Mr. Vavra: That's a check from his bank, Arvest-
Mr. Schamansky: [02:19:00] Oh.
Mr. Vavra: ... that went into her account. Yeah.
Mr. Schamansky: No objection, Your Honor.
Judge Berhalter: You may proceed.
Mr. Vavra: So I'm going to show you an image of a check here. Appear to be a check written by Andrew Griffin?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And can you see the date on the check?
Speaker 8: 3/11.
Mr. Vavra: Of... Can you see the year?
Speaker 8: Oh, I'm sorry. 2021.
Mr. Vavra: All right. Check number up there in the right hand corner?
Speaker 8: 3002.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And in [02:19:30] the memo line, what does it read?
Speaker 8: Salsa Joe's.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And what's the amount on this check?
Speaker 8: 40,000.
Mr. Vavra: Made out to?
Speaker 8: AJS Holdings, LLC.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And can you see whether or not that was deposited into your bank?
Speaker 8: Yes. On the back side of the check, the below copy, it says, "Credited to the account of within named payee in accordance with payee's instructions, absence [02:20:00] of endorsement." And that went to Belmont Savings Bank, Bellaire, Ohio, and that was done at our St. Clairsville office.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Where is your office?
Speaker 8: My office is in Bellaire.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So this first meeting we talked about, would that have been in Bellaire?
Speaker 8: No. The first meeting that all three of them were at was actually in St. Clairsville.
Mr. Vavra: Okay.
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: All right. So does it appear that he deposited $40,000 via check on that same day?
Speaker 8: It does.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Now, if we look back to that statement, [02:20:30] State's Exhibit 155, again, the initial deposit was 80,000.
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: So it looks like Andrew put 40 in. Do you know how much Tom and Angela put in?
Speaker 8: I'm sorry. I don't recall.
Mr. Vavra: Okay.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Mr. Vavra: Do you believe their deposit was cash?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. I'm going to show you a few more images. So we have this check here [02:21:00] on March 11th, 2021, correct?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: The image you're looking at now appears to be the same bank account, Andrew Griffin?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Made out to?
Speaker 8: AJS Holdings, LLC.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And what is the amount of this?
Speaker 8: 20,000.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And what's the date?
Speaker 8: 5/12/2021.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And [02:21:30] in the memo line, can you make out what that is?
Speaker 8: It looks like start up money.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. All right. And can you look at the back of this check and see where that was deposited?
Speaker 8: Yes, that was deposited at Belmont Savings Bank in our St. Clairsville
Mr. Vavra: Office.
Speaker 8: Okay.
Mr. Vavra: And could you see whether it was deposited into that AGS Holdings account that State's Exhibit 155?
Speaker 8: Could you make that larger for me?
Mr. Schamansky: We'll stipulate [02:22:00] that it was, if that helps.
Speaker 8: Okay.
Mr. Vavra: Okay.
Speaker 8: Okay.
Mr. Vavra: Moving down to this next check, same scenario?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Mr. Griffin's Arvest bank account would look like, correct?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And how much is this one for?
Speaker 8: This one is for $10,000.
Mr. Vavra: And same date?
Speaker 8: 6/7/2021.
Mr. Vavra: All right. And can you make out the memo?
Speaker 8: It looks like 50/50 money or 50/30 money, [02:22:30] yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. All right. And...
Speaker 8: Again, it was deposited at Belmont Savings Bank, but it was done at the Bellaire, Ohio office.
Mr. Vavra: Okay.
Judge Berhalter: Mr. Vavra, is the $20,000 check and the $10,000 check still included under Exhibit 137BBBB?
Mr. Vavra: It is, Judge, yes.
Judge Berhalter: Thank you.
Mr. Vavra: [02:23:00] And one more check. Can you see the date on this one?
Speaker 8: Yes. 6/11/2021
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And...
Speaker 8: AJS Holdings, $5,000.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And memo?
Speaker 8: Looks like 50/50 money.
Mr. Vavra: And can you tell where this was deposited?
Speaker 8: Yes, this was deposited at Belmont Savings Bank. There's a signature on the back, so I don't see which branch.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So [02:23:30] amongst those four checks between March 11, '21 and 6/11/21, it would appear Mr. Griffin put about $75,000 in?
Speaker 8: That is correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Between meeting the three of them together in March of '21 until mid-August of '21, did you have any direct dealings with the three of them?
Speaker 8: No, I did not.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. [02:24:00] Did there come a time in August where you did begin having dealings with them?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: How did that start back up?
Speaker 8: I received a call from Angela to remove Andrew's access to the account. I told her I couldn't... They'd have to come in to actually sign new signature cards and to remove him from the account, so... But I could stop his online [02:24:30] access and his debit card access, and that was done at that time.
Mr. Vavra: So they made a phone call to you, you couldn't take him off as an authorized signer over the phone?
Speaker 8: Over the phone, correct.
Mr. Vavra: You could stop online and stop the debit card?
Speaker 8: Yes, because they were the owners of the account.
Mr. Vavra: Do you recall the specific date that this call came through?
Speaker 8: No, I do not.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Do you recall whether they came to the bank and actually filled out the documents that you had requested?
Speaker 8: No.
Mr. Vavra: You don't recall?
Speaker 8: [02:25:00] I don't recall that... I did not do that.
Mr. Vavra: Okay.
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Fair enough. If I go back to 155A and I show you this document, can you tell us what we're looking at?
Speaker 8: Yes, it's a signature card.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Similar to what-
Speaker 8: Previous signature card.
Mr. Vavra: ... the start of this document?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And what's the date on this one?
Speaker 8: It's 8/24/2021.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And again, what are we looking at with this information?
Speaker 8: This information is... It looks like... [02:25:30] Authorized signers, [inaudible 02:25:33] This looks like... I don't know if the things are... It looks like a signature card. They were signing a new signature card, an updated signature card.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And similar information?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Down in the other terms information, what do we have there?
Speaker 8: It says that they [02:26:00] removed Andrew.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And again, we're looking at similar documentation at the start of this, right?
Speaker 8: That's correct.
Mr. Vavra: This is just more signing documents for the signature cards.
Speaker 8: Yes. Right. This... What we're looking at now shows that he... Andrew was not on the resolution. They did remove him.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And this document is dated August 24th, 2021?
Speaker 8: I can't see that.
Mr. Vavra: Oh, sorry.
Speaker 8: [02:26:30] Keep going. August 24th, 2021.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Do you recall... You had the telephone call with Angela. Did you ever talk to Mr. Griffin?
Speaker 8: Yes, he called.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Do you recall roughly when in time that was?
Speaker 8: Oh, actually it was the same day.
Mr. Vavra: As Angela's call?
Speaker 8: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And what was the nature of that call?
Speaker 8: He wanted to know why... [02:27:00] Well, actually he thought that his... He was locked out of his online banking, but I told him at that time that he has been taken off the online banking and his debit card was shut off.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And what was his reaction?
Speaker 8: Seemed a little confused.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Did he ask you any questions about how it happened?
Speaker 8: Well, he asked me why, and I told him I don't know why. That's up to the owners. He would have to talk to Angela [02:27:30] and Tommy on that.
Mr. Vavra: Did he make any other comments or statements that you recall?
Speaker 8: No.
Mr. Vavra: How did that call end?
Speaker 8: Fine. Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Did you have any other contacts from him after that?
Speaker 8: No, I did not.
Mr. Vavra: [02:28:00] No further questions, Judge.
Judge Berhalter: Mr. Schamansky, do you wish to undertake any cross-examination?
Mr. Schamansky: I do, Your Honor. Thank you.
Judge Berhalter: You may proceed when you're ready.
Mr. Schamansky: Thank you. Ma'am, good morning.
Speaker 8: Good morning.
Mr. Schamansky: So it's fair to say that you have no evidence, documentary or from your own mind and experience or otherwise, that one Andrew Griffin ever deposited any cash [02:28:30] currency in this account? You know what I mean by cash, right?
Speaker 8: Yes. Yes, I agree. Yes, cash, physical cash.
Mr. Schamansky: All right. So there's... His contributions are all in the form of a check, correct?
Speaker 8: Correct.
Mr. Schamansky: And tell the jury what a CRT is.
Speaker 8: It's a currency transaction report and anything over $10,000 we have to report to the IRS. So there's a form that's filled out and sent in. Yeah.
Mr. Schamansky: Yeah. And you were doing that regularly for the deposits [02:29:00] that were given to you by Mr. Strussion, correct?
Speaker 8: I personally was not, but the bank would've been doing that.
Mr. Schamansky: Right. And the reason the bank does that... Well, actually you're duty bound to do that by federal law and banking regulations, correct?
Speaker 8: That is correct. Correct.
Mr. Schamansky: And that's because the IRS and our federal government doesn't want your institution to be a laundering instrument, correct?
Speaker 8: That is correct.
Mr. Schamansky: That's all I have. Thank you.
Speaker 8: Thank you.
Judge Berhalter: Any redirect?
Mr. Vavra: No, Judge.
Judge Berhalter: May this witness be excused?
Mr. Vavra: Yes, Judge.
Judge Berhalter: Thank you.
Speaker 8: Thank you.
Mr. Vavra: [inaudible 02:29:32] [02:29:30] good?
Speaker 9: Mm-hmm.
Mr. Vavra: Yeah.
Mr. Schamansky: And I think we just move on to Mr. Weber-
Mr. Vavra: Cool.
Mr. Schamansky: [inaudible 02:29:38]
Mr. Vavra: Yeah. Whatever you need to do. Go ahead.
Judge Berhalter: Is the state ready to proceed?
Mr. Vavra: Yes, Judge.
Judge Berhalter: You may call your next witness.
Mr. Vavra: John Weber.
Speaker 10: John Weber.
[inaudible 02:30:07] [02:30:00] raise your right hand, please.
Do you swear the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?
John Weber: I do.
Speaker 10: Have a seat.
Judge Berhalter: Sir, do you object to being filmed?
John Weber: No.
Judge Berhalter: Thank you.
Mr. Vavra, when the state's ready [02:30:30] to proceed.
Mr. Vavra: Thank you, Judge. Sir, can you tell us your name, please?
John Weber: John P. Weber.
Mr. Vavra: And where are you employed or...
John Weber: Was employed?
Mr. Vavra: Yeah, let me... Let me withdraw that. In 2021, where were you employed?
John Weber: The Ohio Department of Commerce Division of State Fire Marshal in the Fire and Explosion Investigations Bureau.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And you are since retired?
John Weber: I am.
Mr. Vavra: When is your date of retirement?
John Weber: [02:31:00] February of '24.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And can you tell us how long did you serve in your position with the State Fire Marshal's Office?
John Weber: 21 years as an investigator and 13 years as a canine handler. Excuse me.
Mr. Vavra: And did those times overlap?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And as an investigator, what are your duties?
John Weber: To investigate the origin and cause of fires, to identify if it was a criminal act and follow through with [02:31:30] arrest and testimony in trial.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And as a canine handler, tell us a little bit about that. What does that all encompass?
John Weber: In my case, my canine was trained in accelerant detection, so she or he would alert to hydrocarbon products, gasoline, kerosene, paint thinners, lighter fluids.
Mr. Vavra: And you said 13 years as a canine handler?
John Weber: [02:32:00] Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Was that up to your time of retirement?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So in 2021, you would've been a canine handler?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And what kind of trainings do you do and what kind of trainings does your canine do to get to that level? Well,
John Weber: I attended the state fire marshal's arson classes. It was a two week seminar, attended the Ohio... Not the Ohio Fire Academy, the National Fire Academy in Emmitsburg, Maryland for a two week training, and then the [02:32:30] experience of working alongside the other investigators before I got hired. The canine part is ATF, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. They provide the dog, train the dog, and then train the handler how to work the dog.
Mr. Vavra: And if you can, can you bring that mic a little closer to you and try to keep your voice up?
John Weber: Yep.
Mr. Vavra: Thank you. In your time with State Fire Marshal's Office, do you know how many fires you [02:33:00] investigated?
John Weber: In the 21 years, approximately 1,800.
Mr. Vavra: You were on duty on September 21, 2021?
John Weber: Correct, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Did you become aware or were you dispatched to a structure fire, residence fire here in Belmont County, Ohio?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. [02:33:30] Do you recall what information first came to you?
John Weber: It was a double fatality and the fire department had suppressed the fire.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Do you recall roughly when you got notice of it?
John Weber: I believe it was just before eight o'clock in the morning.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And where were you physically at the time?
John Weber: Tuscarawas County, my residence.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Once you get this call, you're told about it, what do you then do?
John Weber: [02:34:00] Get ready, drive down to the location.
Mr. Vavra: And do you recall what time you arrived roughly?
John Weber: I think it was just before nine o'clock.
Mr. Vavra: When you get there, can you tell us what the scene is?
John Weber: Fire trucks all around, sheriff's cars all around, made contact initially with the fire chief, Chief Hunt.
Mr. Vavra: All right. And what information do you get from Chief Hunt?
John Weber: That [02:34:30] there are two victims from the fire, the fire had been extinguished and he was requesting help with the origin and cause.
Mr. Vavra: What are your next steps?
John Weber: Made contact with the other officers that were on scene, Chief Aller. The coroner was there, so I made contact with her as well.
Mr. Vavra: [02:35:00] Okay. And at this point, what are you intending to do as far as your investigation?
John Weber: I'm going to determine how the fire started, where it started, and make that determination.
Mr. Vavra: And what steps do you take to do that?
John Weber: I begin working on the outside of the house. So normally I start at the front, take my pictures, make any observations, and do a 360 all the way around doing the same thing.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And you prepared two reports [02:35:30] relative to this investigation, correct?
John Weber: That's correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And one report would be what's called your incident report?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And does that kind of detail your overall investigation?
John Weber: Yes, pretty much so.
Mr. Vavra: And for the record, Judge, the state has marked this as State's Exhibit 131.
Mr. Schamansky: No objection to its admission or publication to the jury.
Judge Berhalter: Then you may proceed, Mr. Vavra.
Mr. Vavra: All right. [02:36:00] We see here this exhibit is marked State's Exhibit 131. Do you recognize this document, sir?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And what is it?
John Weber: It looks like my incident report.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And again, this details kind of your overall investigation?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. You also prepared a second report, correct?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And that has a different [02:36:30] name to it?
John Weber: It's a canine report.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So that's related mainly to the use of the canine?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And we've marked that as State Exhibit 131A. Permission to show that to the jury, Judge?
Mr. Schamansky: No objection, Your Honor.
Judge Berhalter: Thank you. You may proceed.
Mr. Vavra: So 131A, do you recognize this?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And that's your activity summary report?
John Weber: That's correct.
Mr. Vavra: And that's related to the specifics of the canine?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: All right. [02:37:00] You had mentioned first going around the outside of the home?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And why do you do that or what do we call that?
John Weber: It's basically just to get an idea of where the fire may have started. If you see external fire damage on the siding, on the roof, it may give you a general indication of where a fire started in the house.
Mr. Vavra: And by the time of your arrival, did you see smoke?
John Weber: No.
Mr. Vavra: Did you see fire?
John Weber: No.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. You call this your external [02:37:30] or exterior examination?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Make your way around the whole house?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Note any things of concern or interest?
John Weber: Not fire-wise, no.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. I think your report references there were some tarps on the roof?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And what was your understanding of the tarps being placed on the roof?
John Weber: Those were ventilation holes completed by the fire department, and then they [02:38:00] threw the tarps over top of them to try to keep the weather out because it was raining that day.
Mr. Vavra: Did you note any damage to the exterior of the home otherwise, other than fire damage?
John Weber: I did not.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Were there hoses still in the home or running through the home at the time?
John Weber: I think when I initially got there, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So really nothing of note on the exterior examination?
John Weber: No.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. At a certain point, do you conduct an interior examination?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: [02:38:30] Okay. And I guess at what point in the process do you do that? We know the fire department's there, sheriff's office there, BCI is there. What point do you start your interior examination?
John Weber: Well, as soon as we got the fire department out and BCI had finished their documentation, I began my examination of the interior.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And what are you doing for your interior examination?
John Weber: I'm looking for burn [02:39:00] patterns, heat patterns, smoke patterns to identify where the fire may have started.
Mr. Vavra: When you enter the home, which door do you enter into?
John Weber: I entered the front door.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And at that point, any smoke inside?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Still smokey?
John Weber: Not smoky, smokey, but you could definitely have an odor of smoke.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. All right. And what was your impression upon entering that front door?
John Weber: That there was fire right in that living room. [02:39:30] You walk through a foyer area, there was a TV or something that had fallen off the wall, and as you progressed, I think it was south into the living room, there was more extensive damage to a couch.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Were there still hoses inside the home at the time?
John Weber: Initially, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Was there still sitting water or water inside from the...
John Weber: Yeah, there was moisture, I would call it. It was still wet.
Mr. Vavra: [02:40:00] Okay. Had the firefighters cleared the scene?
John Weber: By this point, yeah. They haven't left the scene, but they're not in the house at this point.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So you enter the living room. Kind of tell us again, what do you see in that living room, which is right when you enter the front door?
John Weber: The north part of the living room has a couch that is heavily damaged by fire. It's almost down to the framework, and then there would've been another couch to the right of that, that was relatively intact.
Mr. Vavra: [02:40:30] Okay. Note anything else in the living room?
John Weber: Smoke detector had melted. That would've been on the, I got to think about it, the west wall in the living room.
Mr. Vavra: After you leave the living room, which area do you go to?
John Weber: I believe we went to the kitchen.
Mr. Vavra: What did you take note of in the kitchen, if anything?
John Weber: A lot of heavy soot deposits throughout the kitchen, [02:41:00] and we found a pan and a bottle of possibly oil on the stove top.
Mr. Vavra: And what was your understanding of what was going on with the stove?
John Weber: One of the firefighters had entered and saw that all four burners were glowing red, and then he shut the burners off.
Mr. Vavra: And do you recall, so the burners were on when they entered?
John Weber: That's what I was told.
Mr. Vavra: Do you recall what level? I mean, you see low, high, medium?
John Weber: I believe he [02:41:30] told me they were all on high.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And you said this bottle was sitting on one of the burners?
John Weber: That's correct.
Mr. Vavra: That was still when you got there?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. After the kitchen, which area do you go to?
John Weber: Probably down the foyer into the hallway area... Or, I'm sorry, I went to the garage next.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Did you note anything in the garage?
John Weber: Some soot deposits and then the two deceased animals that were in the garage. There was also [02:42:00] gasoline container and a white bottle.
Mr. Vavra: White bottle?
John Weber: I think it was bleach.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. All right. Did you investigate at all or look at that gas can?
John Weber: We looked at it, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. You said there were animals in there?
John Weber: Yes, two dogs.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Did you make any note or take any note of the condition of the dogs?
John Weber: There did not appear to be any trauma to the dogs. It looks like they had passed from smoke [02:42:30] inhalation.
Mr. Vavra: Anything else of note in the garage?
John Weber: No, sir.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. What do you do next?
John Weber: Probably continue into the house down the hallway area.
Mr. Vavra: And you're talking, you're heading east inside the house towards the bedroom area?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. In the hallway, note anything?
John Weber: There's a closet in the hallway that's got substantial fire damage within the closet.
Mr. Vavra: [02:43:00] You proceed where next?
John Weber: Right into the master bedroom.
Mr. Vavra: And what did you take note of in that master bedroom?
John Weber: There was another area of fire that was at the foot of the bed. There appeared to be a number of receipts, some linen, part of the mattress and the box frame had fire damage to them.
Mr. Vavra: Anything else of note in the bedroom?
John Weber: No, sir.
Mr. Vavra: Where do you go from there?
John Weber: Probably up to [02:43:30] the second floor.
Mr. Vavra: And did you take note of anything in the second floor?
John Weber: Heavy soot deposits throughout the entire second floor, no substantial fire damage, and then we located deceased cat.
Mr. Vavra: Did you take anything of note about the cat?
John Weber: Same as the dogs. They didn't appear to have any trauma to it. Looks like it just went to sleep, died from smoke inhalation.
Mr. Vavra: Did you enter the basement area?
John Weber: I did.
Mr. Vavra: Anything of note in the basement?
John Weber: [02:44:00] No substantial fire patterns. The area below the closet that would be in that hallway did have some saddle burns in the floor joists, but again, no substantial fire damage anywhere else in the basement.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Now, as a part of your investigation, you photograph areas of note?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And you have provided those photographs to the state?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay.
Mr. Schamansky: Stipulate [02:44:30] they're true and accurate. No problem with them being published to the jury, Your Honor.
Judge Berhalter: You may proceed.
Mr. Vavra: Showing you what's marked as State Exhibit 131B. Do you recognize this photograph?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And what is this?
John Weber: It's the front of the house.
Mr. Vavra: And why did you take this photo?
John Weber: To show the address.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And that's just part of your case file?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Looking at 131C, what are we looking at here?
John Weber: That is the remains of the couch in the living room, [02:45:00] and it's my first area of origin-
PART 5 OF 13 ENDS [02:45:04]
John Weber: And it's my first area of origin.
Mr. Vavra: And is that your marker there?
John Weber: That is my marker.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. You said your first area of origin.
John Weber: That's the first area I identified as an origin.
Mr. Vavra: What do you mean when you say origin?
John Weber: Origin is basically where the fire first starts.
Mr. Vavra: So based on your investigation, a fire was started at or around this couch?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: [02:45:30] 131D. Do you recognize this photograph?
John Weber: Two is going to be the hallway closet.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Is that your placard there, number two?
John Weber: That is my placard.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. What did you take this picture for? What does this note?
John Weber: We identified that as a second area that had caught fire, and there was no communication from the living room to the hallway.
Mr. Vavra: So the fire at the [02:46:00] couch did not meet up with or connect with this fire?
John Weber: It did not.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. 131E, does it appear to be another different angle of that photograph?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: What are we looking at with that piping there in the ground? Or is that...
John Weber: You'll have to point to me.
Mr. Vavra: If we look where your placard is and then here, what are we looking at here?
John Weber: That's a floor joist, I believe.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. [02:46:30] You had mentioned earlier something about the basement?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And the damage you noted there?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Would that have been this area?
John Weber: Yes. Over top that area.
Mr. Vavra: 131, oh, sorry, F. What are we looking at here?
John Weber: That's going to be in the master bedroom, the base of [02:47:00] the bed. You can see part of the mattresses is burned and the covering blanket type thing.
Mr. Vavra: And that's again, your placard there?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: What you're talking about is in this area here where the mouse cursor is, the bed spring appears to be-
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: ... pretty well damaged?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Why did you mark this with placard number three?
John Weber: Again, there was no communication from the hallway or the living room [02:47:30] that would've explained that fire starting in the master bedroom.
Mr. Vavra: So again, a separate point of origin?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. 131G, what are we looking at here?
John Weber: We're in the kitchen at this point. We're looking at the stove top.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And that's your fourth placard?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. What did you place that placard there for?
John Weber: I believe that was another attempted origin, that [02:48:00] the most probable way was to get that oil to boil and cause a small explosion, starting another fire.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. To your knowledge, this never ignited?
John Weber: It did not.
Mr. Vavra: And 131H, you took this photograph as well?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: What did you take this photograph for?
John Weber: That is the remains of the smoke detector. It would've been up close to the ceiling. It got hot enough in the living room that it melted [02:48:30] the components of it and it fell to the floor.
Mr. Vavra: 131I, do you recognize that photo?
John Weber: Yes, that's the living room and that's location the smoke detector came from.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Does this show other damage of note?
John Weber: Yes. For me, it shows that there was a good amount of heat up high.
Mr. Vavra: What makes you say that?
John Weber: Your melting plastics. [02:49:00] Anywhere from 200 to 400 degrees can melt some plastics. So it got warm enough that it let the fasteners go and it fell to the floor.
Mr. Vavra: Is it fair to say we're also seeing some of the drywall screws and drywall holes there?
John Weber: Yes, correct. Behind the remains of the detector, yes.
Mr. Vavra: 131J, can you tell us what we're [02:49:30] looking at here?
John Weber: That's the bottle of oil we found on the stove.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So when we looked at the picture a couple minutes ago, the bottle was not there?
John Weber: That's correct.
Mr. Vavra: Had been removed?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: This is how it was found?
John Weber: Initially, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And as you indicated, those four burners were on high when the fire department entered?
John Weber: Correct. You can also see some discoloration in the pan to the right side there. You can see [02:50:00] the blues and the red, so you can tell that was under heat for an extended period as well.
Mr. Vavra: Were you able to make any determination about how any of the fires were started?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. What was your determination?
John Weber: An unidentified open flame device was used to apply to the three area of origins.
Mr. Vavra: Could you tell whether there were any kindling or [02:50:30] things like that?
John Weber: Some paper materials.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Did you know would that have been receipts that were found?
John Weber: In the master bedroom, it looked like receipts, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So you do all this, you do your interior investigation, you take photographs. Had you utilized your canine at that point?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. When does that part of the process happen?
John Weber: I [02:51:00] did the canine examination before we disturbed anything in the house, so we hadn't done any digging, so to speak.
Mr. Vavra: It's my understanding you actually do two canine investigations?
John Weber: I did two separate examinations, yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. So your first one you said you do before there's any disturbing of the scene?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Tell us how the canine investigation does. I'm interested in your use of the word, the dog is calibrated.
John Weber: Yes. Before you [02:51:30] complete an examination, the canine is calibrated, and in our case, we use 50% evaporated gasoline. So you put a drop of that somewhere away from the home, let the dog find it, he alerts and he gets his reward, which is food. So for us, it shows that the dog is working before he goes into the house. And then after we complete an examination, we'll have him alert to that same spot again, and it shows he's still hungry enough that he wants to alert [02:52:00] and get his reward.
Mr. Vavra: So you do that before first entry?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Tell us about your first investigation or first attempt to walk through with Max.
John Weber: Basically start at the front door, give the command seek. You allow the dog to go wherever he wants in the house on the initial exam. This case, we made a pass pretty much through the whole house, and then I do a detailed exam where I give him commands. I drop my fingers down and say, "Seek," [02:52:30] and he'll follow my path throughout the perimeter of the house.
Mr. Vavra: What is the purpose of doing this with your canines? Your canine's name is Max, right?
John Weber: It was Max, yes.
Mr. Vavra: So what are you doing and what's the purpose of doing this with Max?
John Weber: We're trying to identify if there was any type of liquid accelerant that may have been used to start the fires.
Mr. Vavra: And you had mentioned before that's gasoline, paint thinners, things like that?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Your first go around with Max, was there any indication of accelerants being used?
John Weber: [02:53:00] There was no alerts from Max, so there was no indications.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. You then said you do a second search with Max?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Why is that?
John Weber: Just in case when we went and dug through stuff and moved stuff, might have been a pocket or something that wasn't exposed prior to.
Mr. Vavra: So first time's pre-debris removal. Second time's post-debris removal?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: So moving things around?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: [02:53:30] You complete that entire process again with Max?
John Weber: I do.
Mr. Vavra: He's calibrated outside?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Goes in, search?
John Weber: Yes.
Mr. Vavra: And anything of note, any accelerant?
John Weber: No. No indications again.
Mr. Vavra: Now, you said in your time working for the fire marshal, you've investigated 1,800 fires?
John Weber: Approximately.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. And [02:54:00] fair to say some of those involve just the issue of arson, some might involve arson, plus another crime?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: Can you talk to us in your experience how a fire affects a crime scene?
John Weber: It can alter evidence. It can destroy evidence. I guess that people would set fires to try to hide whatever activity they were doing, whether it was fingerprints, DNA.
Mr. Vavra: What about any ancillary effects [02:54:30] of a fire? Start a fire, there's going to be smoke, right?
John Weber: Correct.
Mr. Vavra: How does that affect things?
John Weber: Well, it creates smoke in the house. Remember that heat rises, so that smoke initially goes high, and once it starts to cool, it drops back down to the floor. So soot will cover up some things.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Typically, when we have a fire, we have a firefighter. And what are firefighters doing to put fires out?
John Weber: [02:55:00] They're going to hose them down with water.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. How does that affect a scene in your experience?
John Weber: It can wash certain things away.
Mr. Vavra: The water's got to get in there somewhere, right? So who's spraying the water around?
John Weber: It'd be the firefighters.
Mr. Vavra: And what are they doing to a scene?
John Weber: I don't think I should say that, but sometimes during their operation, they'll destroy things, whether it to be to ventilate something [02:55:30] or to get the fire completely put out. They may have to breach a wall or bust some windows.
Mr. Vavra: And in fairness to them, they're not worried about necessarily protecting the scene, they're worried about getting the fire out?
John Weber: That's correct.
Mr. Vavra: Did you note in your report or did you note at the scene how many firefighters were there when you got there?
John Weber: Not specifically.
Mr. Vavra: Okay. Now, you had talked about how these fires were [02:56:00] set or ignited, the areas that they were found. Were you able to make any determination about how they were ultimately extinguished?
John Weber: I believe the master bedroom self-extinguished. The closet, the firefighters put out. And the living room couch, I think they just doused it. It was basically just in a smoldering state.
Mr. Vavra: What is a smoldering state?
John Weber: There's still heat involved and it's producing products of incomplete [02:56:30] combustion, so your smoke.
Mr. Vavra: Based upon your review of the scene and how you saw the fires and what you looked at, are you able to tell us how long those fires burned?
John Weber: Not specifically, no, but it had to have been an extended amount of time.
Mr. Vavra: What makes you say that?
John Weber: [02:57:00] The amount of heat that built up in the upper levels of the home, the amount of smoke and soot deposits that were throughout the entire residence. It looks like the fires basically got started pretty good, but ran out of oxygen at a certain point and went to a smoldering state.
Mr. Vavra: [02:57:30] No further questions, Judge.
Mr. Szymanski: No questions. Thank you, Your Honor.
Judge: Mr. Maver, may this witness be excused?
Mr. Vavra: Yes, Judge.
Judge: Thank you, sir.
Mr. Vavra: Approach, Judge?
Judge: Yes.
[02:58:30] Be here about noon, maybe [02:59:00] a little bit early. You know you're not confined to that room. Once you eat, you're free to. Sun looks like it's out, maybe a little bit warm. If you want to stretch your legs, feel free. But remember my admonitions. Have no discussions with anyone, including amongst yourselves, anything about this case. Do not do any research. Do not review any media or online stories about this case. And that aside, I'll see you back here about [02:59:30] five until one. Thank [03:00:00] you.
[inaudible 03:00:13] recess for lunch. Are there any issues the state of Ohio needs to address?
Mr. Vavra: No, Judge.
Judge: Mr. Szymanski, same question.
Mr. Szymanski: We're good, sir. Thank you.
Judge: All right. Then the court will be in recess at this time.
Mr. Vavra: Can we discuss in here, right?
Mr. Szymanski: [inaudible 03:00:27].
PART 6 OF 13 ENDS [03:18:04]
Speaker 11: (silence)
PART 7 OF 13 ENDS [03:51:04]
Judge: [04:15:00] We're back on the record in State of Ohio versus Andrew Griffin. Mr. Griffin is present in the courtroom with his counsel. The state of Ohio is represented. [04:15:30] And we have the jury back in the courtroom. We are returning after a lunch break, inquiring with the jury any issues at all in following the orders of this court? No one has raised their hand. Mr. Vavra, we're still at the state's case in chief. Are you ready to proceed?
Mr. Vavra: Yes, Judge.
Judge: You may call your next witness.
Mr. Vavra: State calls Christina Logwood.
Speaker 12: [04:16:00] Do you swear the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Speaker 12: Have a seat.
Judge: Afternoon, ma'am.
Christina Logwo...: Hi.
Judge: Do you object to being built?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Judge: Okay. [04:16:30] Mr. Henzo, whenever you're ready to proceed.
Mr. Henzo: Thank you, Your Honor. Please state your name for the record.
Christina Logwo...: Christina Logwood.
Mr. Henzo: And please spell your last name.
Christina Logwo...: L-O-G-W-O-O-D.
Mr. Henzo: Where do you work?
Christina Logwo...: I work at Walmart here in St. Clairsville, Ohio.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. How long have you worked there?
Christina Logwo...: About 25 years.
Mr. Henzo: What do [04:17:00] you currently do?
Christina Logwo...: I'm the asset protection manager.
Mr. Henzo: What does an asset protection manager do?
Christina Logwo...: So I am over the security and all the merchandise, customers, associates, anything in the building.
Mr. Henzo: And how long have you been in that particular role?
Christina Logwo...: Since January of this year.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Prior to that, what different roles did you have at Walmart?
Christina Logwo...: So I've been in HR. I've been a front end manager. I've been an hourly supervisor. I've been the front end manager, [04:17:30] digital manager. So I've done a lot of different roles, department manager. I've moved around the stores.
Mr. Henzo: You mentioned you've been there for 20 years. Is that 20 years at the St. Clairsville store?
Christina Logwo...: No, it's been almost five years here. Before that previously, I spent about 19 years at the Cambridge store.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And any experience at Walmart prior to that?
Christina Logwo...: I was only in my 20s when I started, so been with them most of my life, over half of my life.
Mr. Henzo: [04:18:00] Did your employer assign you to testify for us today?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And who would've contacted you about it?
Christina Logwo...: Home office security, global security.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. In your role, are you familiar with records kept by Walmart?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Would that include things like sales receipts?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Speaker 13: [inaudible 04:18:29] going to stipulate to the [04:18:30] series of Walmart records.
Judge: All right. And what... Do you have those numbers?
Mr. Henzo: I do, Your Honor. 143 and 143A are both Walmart records.
Judge: And those are the records you are stipulating to?
Mr. Henzo: They are, Your Honor.
Judge: And that's to their authenticity?
Mr. Henzo: Yes, sir.
Judge: Okay.
Mr. Henzo: Your Honor, may I publish those now or should I...
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Thank you. [04:19:00] Are you able to see that?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Your Honor, may I approach the witness?
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: I'm going to [04:19:30] hand you a laser pointer.
Christina Logwo...: Okay.
Mr. Henzo: When I ask you questions, it's up to you whether you want to be looking at that one or looking at the one on your screen. But when I ask you to point something out or we talk about something, if you could, maybe point it out on that screen with that laser pointer for our jurors. Do you recognize State's Exhibit 143?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: And what are we looking at?
Christina Logwo...: We're looking at a receipt for a phone [04:20:00] card and a power bank.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And could you tell me where this receipt is from?
Christina Logwo...: It is from store 216 Marion, Illinois.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And how do you know that?
Christina Logwo...: The store number up there at the top where it says ST, that is the store number.
Mr. Henzo: And to the right of that, there's a number OP and-
Christina Logwo...: That is the operator number. That would be the person that rang the items up. Every associate has a unique operator [04:20:30] number.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. So in layman's terms, that's a cashier?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Is there any significance to you of the TE number?
Christina Logwo...: The TE would be the register number, 67, which is electronics.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. You could tell that how?
Christina Logwo...: That's where all of our electronics registers in the company. They usually have them like 67, 68. Each register has a unique number that's given to them each area.
Mr. Henzo: And TR number-
Christina Logwo...: [04:21:00] Is the transaction number. Every time that somebody purchases something, there is a transaction given for that.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Then I'm going to call that the first line of the receipt and maybe it's not, but if you-
Christina Logwo...: The Cricket?
Mr. Henzo: Yeah.
Christina Logwo...: That is a Cricket $30 phone card.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. When you say Cricket $30 phone card, what does that mean?
Christina Logwo...: It's a prepaid phone. So you have to purchase minutes to be able to use the phone.
Mr. Henzo: Is that receipt reflecting the purchase [04:21:30] of phone? That first line, Cricket 30, is that reflecting the phone or the card?
Christina Logwo...: That's the phone card.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And that costs how much?
Christina Logwo...: $30.
Mr. Henzo: All right. The line immediately below it that starts TZ, do you recognize that?
Christina Logwo...: Yeah, it's a power bank to charge a phone.
Mr. Henzo: That TZ10KMAH, what is the significance of that?
Christina Logwo...: It's just the brand. They abbreviate the brands.
Mr. Henzo: [04:22:00] Okay. What does that next number mean?
Christina Logwo...: The phone card activation is for the phone card. Every time that you activate something, it will give you a unique number that you can use to load. Sometimes you can do it online, other times you would call, but that's a number that you would use.
Mr. Henzo: So the-
Christina Logwo...: Oops.
Mr. Henzo: [04:22:30] So I'll cycle back to the charger you mentioned, the second line there. How much did that cost?
Christina Logwo...: 14.88.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Is there any significance to T or AD on the right side of that?
Christina Logwo...: No.
Mr. Henzo: And you mentioned those next lines where it says phone card activated. What is that POP, or PO-
Christina Logwo...: That's for your number to activate the phone card. Each one of them, if you scratch off the back or... It used [04:23:00] to be they would print out a separate receipt also with a number for you that you need to put in for those minutes. When you use a prepaid phone, you have to put in a card number.
Mr. Henzo: So that information's meant to be communicated to the customer so he or she can set up the phone?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And then the line that begins Vision 3, what are we talking about there?
Christina Logwo...: That is the actual phone.
Mr. Henzo: And how much did that phone cost?
Christina Logwo...: 39. [04:23:30] 88.
Mr. Henzo: What kind of phone are we talking about?
Christina Logwo...: Like a Cricket phone.
Mr. Henzo: Okay.
Christina Logwo...: It's just a prepaid is what it is.
Mr. Henzo: How does a prepaid phone work?
Christina Logwo...: So you go in and... Back then it would've been you... Now they're locked up, so you would have to go to an associate and get it. Back then we didn't lock them up because our thoughts was back then and five years ago that they didn't have any meaning if you didn't have a phone card or activate them. Now they've taken it a little more serious and we lock [04:24:00] them up because people's figured out how to switch-
PART 8 OF 13 ENDS [04:24:04]
Christina Logwo...: Lock them up because people's figured out how to switch SIM cards and things.
Mr. Henzo: So in 2021, if a person came into the store to pick up one of these phone cards, one of these phones itself, would they have to speak with someone?
Christina Logwo...: No.
Mr. Henzo: You could just grab it off the shelf and go to the checkout?
Christina Logwo...: Mm-hmm.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. But did you describe this checkout would be back in the electronic center?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Could you speak up a little bit?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: [04:24:30] I think the last question I asked you is if someone bought this, would they need to see anyone to get access to the card?
Christina Logwo...: No, not at that time.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Would they need to see anyone to get access to the phone?
Christina Logwo...: No.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Is there any significance to the next line? Well, I guess I'm skipping the sum total, but where it says phone card activated and there's another number there?
Christina Logwo...: No, it just always puts the double numbers. The one would be the actual phone card, the other one, the number, and then the other one is for the activation.
Mr. Henzo: [04:25:00] Okay. And how much did this total purchase cost?
Christina Logwo...: It cost 93.73.
Mr. Henzo: And how did this customer pay?
Christina Logwo...: Cash.
Mr. Henzo: And how much cash?
Christina Logwo...: $100.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And down at the bottom there, there's a TC number. What is the significance of that?
Christina Logwo...: The TC is, so if it was going to be returned, that's what we use to do any kind of return at the store.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. So if I'm returning a product I bought-
Christina Logwo...: Yes, that is the number [04:25:30] we would put in to return it. It's a transaction code.
Mr. Henzo: And then does this document tell you the date and time?
Christina Logwo...: Yes, it does.
Mr. Henzo: And what is that?
Christina Logwo...: It is on September 19th, 2021 at 5:05.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Would that be local time or is that-
Christina Logwo...: Yeah, whatever time it was there.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Your Honor, I'm going to show her State's Exhibit 143A. It's also a document from Walmart. [04:26:00] I believe it's been stipulated to.
Judge: It has.
Mr. Henzo: State's Exhibit 143A, do you recognize that?
Christina Logwo...: Yes. That is the power charger, the power juice.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And is this a product that Walmart has?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: And on here, we're looking at something that's... The header on this is Walmart, correct?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: [04:26:30] And on the left there, is that the receipt we've been talking about?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Where does the information on the right come from?
Christina Logwo...: That, they would've looked it up and got it online to print it off.
Mr. Henzo: Who would this have come from? Who would've printed it?
Christina Logwo...: Global Security at Walmart.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And is that... Let me zoom in. [04:27:00] Does that... The information on the right, does it have a... Does it identify the product?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: And how is it identified?
Christina Logwo...: The 10,000, and that is also the 10,000, how it says on the receipt, the TZ10K, that over there is the also 10,000.
Mr. Henzo: So is that device depicted on the right the same device-
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: ... reflected in the receipt? Okay. If [04:27:30] you would let me finish my question before you answer. It's all right. Can you say these are identical items? Well, I guess, is there a serial number or identifier on one of these power banks?
Christina Logwo...: No, there's no serial numbers on the power banks.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Walmart doesn't keep any sort of record like that, that unique identifier?
Christina Logwo...: Not on the power banks.
Mr. Henzo: Do you do that for other products?
Christina Logwo...: Other products, yes, we do. [04:28:00] It's just some of the... It depends on price generally and what the item is, but we do not put serial numbers on.
Mr. Henzo: Your Honor, may I approach the witness?
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: I'm going to show her State's Exhibit 112. Do [04:28:30] you recognize that item?
Christina Logwo...: It's the pocket juice.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Is that the same item we've been talking about or a similar item to what we've been talking about in that receipt?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: As you sit here today, there's no way for you to [04:29:00] say that's the exact same item?
Christina Logwo...: No.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Do Walmarts have surveillance cameras?
Christina Logwo...: Yes, we do.
Mr. Henzo: And has that been true throughout your time there?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: In 2021, would they have had surveillance cameras?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: How long are those... Are those cameras live only or do they record?
Christina Logwo...: They do record. Back then, they would've only kept [04:29:30] about 90 days.
Mr. Henzo: What happens after 90 days?
Christina Logwo...: We just lose everything.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. If I purchase... Well, if someone purchases one of these prepaid phone cards or Cricket phone, do they have to provide any information to Walmart to make that purchase?
Christina Logwo...: No.
Mr. Henzo: Do they have to provide a name?
Christina Logwo...: No.
Mr. Henzo: Address, anything like that?
Christina Logwo...: [04:30:00] No.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Same question. I guess I asked you that about the phone. Does the same thing hold true of the plan?
Christina Logwo...: With the plan, no, you don't have to.
Mr. Henzo: If any of that goes on, Walmart's not involved, is that correct?
Christina Logwo...: Right.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. [04:30:30] Do you have to provide an identification to make a purchase of any of these items?
Christina Logwo...: No.
Mr. Henzo: Nothing further of this witness, Your Honor. I'm going to retrieve that if it's all right.
Judge: Yes. Mr. Schmansky, do you wish to engage in any cross-examination?
Mr. Schmansky: I do. Thank you, sir.
Judge: You may proceed.
Mr. Schmansky: How are you?
Christina Logwo...: Good.
Mr. Schmansky: Walmart, more than half of your life, right?
Christina Logwo...: Right.
Mr. Schmansky: [04:31:00] Now help me about the scale of this corporation that you're a most important part of, okay?
Christina Logwo...: Okay.
Mr. Schmansky: And just tell me if I got this wonky, but like 4,600 stores and counting, right?
Christina Logwo...: Oh, easily.
Mr. Schmansky: Okay. And I'm just trying to think about the math in my head. We're just talking about 4,600 stores in the United States, right?
Christina Logwo...: Mm-hmm.
Mr. Schmansky: And [04:31:30] this pocket charger, you're familiar with Walmart and Home Depot and a lot of the large retailers are purchasing these things in enormous bulk, correct?
Christina Logwo...: Correct.
Mr. Schmansky: And that's the way they keep prices advantageous for the consumer, right?
Christina Logwo...: Correct.
Mr. Schmansky: And so my just little bit of research, and I'm not great at math, but let's just say that Walmart only sold a hundred of these a year, right, across their stores. [04:32:00] Does that math work out almost half a million phone chargers?
Christina Logwo...: If they sold how many? I'm sorry.
Mr. Schmansky: A hundred.
Christina Logwo...: Okay.
Mr. Schmansky: Times 4,600?
Christina Logwo...: Yeah.
Mr. Schmansky: So if they only sold a couple a month, right?
Christina Logwo...: Right.
Mr. Schmansky: We'd be talking about a half a million chargers, right?
Christina Logwo...: Yes.
Mr. Schmansky: Okay. That's all I have. Thank you.
Judge: Any redirect?
Mr. Henzo: No, Your Honor. Thank you.
Judge: May this witness be excused?
Mr. Henzo: Yes, Your Honor.
Judge: Thank you.
Mr. Henzo: [04:32:30] May we approach, Your Honor?
Judge: Yes. Sir, can you hear and see me?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, I can.
Judge: All right. And can [04:34:00] you state your name?
Tommy Williamso...: Tommy Williamson.
Judge: Mr. Williamson, will you raise your right hand? The bailiff's going to swear you in.
Mr. Henzo: Do you swear the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Tommy Williamso...: I do.
Judge: This is your next witness?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, Your Honor.
Judge: All right. When he was being sworn in [04:34:30] and responding, could you see and hear him?
Mr. Henzo: I could.
Judge: Mr. Schmansky, same question to you.
Mr. Schmansky: Yes, Your Honor. I would like the court to inquire if there's anybody with him.
Judge: Mr. Williamson, is there anybody sitting with you in that vehicle?
Tommy Williamso...: No, there isn't.
Judge: All right. And to the jury, just raise your hand. Is there anyone that could not hear and see him? No one has raised their hand. Mr. Kinser, are you ready to proceed?
Mr. Henzo: I am, sir.
Judge: All right. [04:35:00] Mr. Kinser, one minute. Hold one minute, sir. Mr. Williamson, these proceedings are being broadcast, that is they're being filmed. Do you have any objection to being filmed?
Tommy Williamso...: I don't want to be filmed.
Judge: Okay. I will honor that request. You may proceed.
Mr. Henzo: Sir, will you please state your name for the record?
Tommy Williamso...: Tommy Williamson.
Mr. Henzo: [04:35:30] Can you spell your last name?
Tommy Williamso...: W-I-L-L-I-A-M-S-O-N.
Mr. Henzo: Mr. Williamson, where do you live?
Tommy Williamso...: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma.
Mr. Henzo: How long have you lived there, sir?
Tommy Williamso...: Oh, [04:36:00] three years.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And you are... I noticed, sir, that you've got oxygen or what I take to be oxygen. Why is that, sir?
Tommy Williamso...: I've got COPD and emphysema.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Do you have any other medical conditions?
Tommy Williamso...: Diabetes.
Mr. Henzo: And is there an issue for you with your COPD, your emphysema, that prevents you from traveling?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: [04:36:30] Okay. Is that something that you get under doctor's advice?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Sir, do you currently work?
Tommy Williamso...: Could you repeat that?
Mr. Henzo: Do you currently work, sir?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, I do.
Mr. Henzo: Where do you work?
Tommy Williamso...: Casillas Petroleum.
Mr. Henzo: And what do you do, sir?
Tommy Williamso...: I'm a production superintendent over the whole state of Oklahoma.
Mr. Henzo: [04:37:00] How long have you been in that field, sir?
Tommy Williamso...: Since 2016.
Mr. Henzo: What sort of... What do you do in your day-to-day in that job?
Tommy Williamso...: Well, we got rigs running. I look after the rigs and just try to keep everything running, really.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And have you ever met Andrew Griffin, sir?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, sir. I have.
Mr. Henzo: [04:37:30] And when did you first come to... How long have you known Andrew Griffin?
Tommy Williamso...: I think I first met Andrew, it was back in 2011 or... Yeah, 2011.
Mr. Henzo: Did you come to meet him personally, professionally, or how would you describe that?
Tommy Williamso...: I was a consultant back then for Newfield Exploration, and he was a shop man for TPS, and he brought some tools out to our location.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. So was he working [04:38:00] for another company other than yours?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, sir, he was.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And throughout that time of knowing him, did you know him professionally? Did you know him personally?
Tommy Williamso...: I just knew him professionally in the beginning, and then he just lived over the mountain from me back then, and so we became pretty good friends, and the rest is history, really.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. So about how [04:38:30] long were the two of you friends?
Tommy Williamso...: From 2011 until he ran off.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. When is it that he ran off?
Mr. Schmansky: Object, Your Honor, to the characterization ran off.
Tommy Williamso...: Well, when he left, when he'd come up missing-
Judge: Hold on, Mr. Williamson. Can you both approach?
Tommy Williamso...: From 2016 at Casillas, from 2016 to 2020, right there, just right before COVID hit.
Mr. Henzo: [04:41:00] Okay. Outside of that time when he was a contractor with that company, did you ever work with him other than that?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, at Newfield, but he was... [04:41:30] Yes, at Newfield. He had took on a role as a mixing plant operator at TPS when I was still at Newfield.
Mr. Henzo: Could you tell us what timeframe that took place?
Tommy Williamso...: Probably 2012 to 2016.
Mr. Henzo: And what was the most recent job that he ever would've had where he worked with you?
Tommy Williamso...: Most recent job that he ever [04:42:00] had when he was working with me?
Mr. Henzo: Yes, sir.
Tommy Williamso...: He was a mixing plant operator.
Mr. Henzo: And which company was that?
Tommy Williamso...: He was with TPS.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. And what timeframe was that?
Tommy Williamso...: That was... That was 2016 to 2020.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. After that, were you aware of where he worked after 2020?
Tommy Williamso...: I was aware of when he went to work for Stealth.
Mr. Henzo: Who is Stealth?
Tommy Williamso...: [04:42:30] Stealth is another... I guess they're another tool outfit. I think Andrew was going to be a fisherman for them.
Mr. Henzo: What does that mean, being a fisherman?
Tommy Williamso...: When you run tools in the well, fish stuff out that they've left in the hole.
Mr. Henzo: And do you know what timeframe that was?
Tommy Williamso...: Well, [04:43:00] to the best of my knowledge, no.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Well, were you involved in them getting that job?
Tommy Williamso...: I think they called me as a reference.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Do you know, did he start that job?
Tommy Williamso...: I know that he was supposed to have started it.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Did you ever hear from him after that?
Tommy Williamso...: No. One time, yes, I did. [04:43:30] One time when he came back from wherever he went to.
Mr. Henzo: To your knowledge, did he start that job with... Was it New Field?
Tommy Williamso...: No. No. It was somebody completely... I didn't work for them then.
Mr. Henzo: Okay.
Tommy Williamso...: I was working for Casillas and he had went and took this job for Stealth, and [04:44:00] that's whenever he left the country in the truck.
Mr. Schmansky: Object to that, and move to strike.
Judge: Are you seeking questions as to how or where he has gotten this information?
Mr. Henzo: I apologize, Your Honor. You're saying this witness?
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: I have not asked that question yet, but I can. How are you-
Judge: And I'll address your objection.
Mr. Henzo: [04:44:30] How are you aware of what you're describing, the defendant departing?
Tommy Williamso...: At that time, I talked to Andrew quite a bit at that time, just over the telephone.
Mr. Henzo: Did he ever say anything about leaving to you?
Tommy Williamso...: Never.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Subsequently, did you lose contact with Andrew?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, sir.
Mr. Henzo: How long did you lose contact with Andrew?
Tommy Williamso...: [04:45:00] I'm going to say three months.
Mr. Henzo: At any juncture, did you get concerned for his wellbeing?
Mr. Schmansky: Object, relevancy.
Judge: That's overruled.
Mr. Henzo: Sir, you can answer the question. Did you get concerned for his wellbeing?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, I did.
Mr. Henzo: Okay. Why?
Tommy Williamso...: Because when you go down in the country where he was at, they tell you not to stop on the side of [04:45:30] the road to help nobody.
Mr. Schmansky: Objection to what somebody said, Your Honor.
Judge: Let's approach, please.
Mr. Henzo: [04:46:00] What area of the country or the state was that job supposed to be?
Tommy Williamso...: West Texas.
Mr. Henzo: [04:46:30] And are you personally aware of it being difficult to work in West Texas?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes, sir.
Mr. Henzo: Why so?
Tommy Williamso...: Because I've been there myself.
Mr. Henzo: And what did you experience there?
Tommy Williamso...: Well, I was on a location from the time I went there until I left, you know? I mean, but they just got rules that you need to go by because at that time our border was pretty well open [04:47:00] and he was told when you come out there not to stop to help nobody on the side of the road, and Andrew being Andrew-
Mr. Schmansky: Object, Your Honor.
Tommy Williamso...: ... there was somebody on the side of the road he was going-
Judge: Hold on, please.
Mr. Schmansky: Please.
Judge: I understand, and I thought we were getting somewhere and we're not there.
Mr. Henzo: Let me ask a question another way, Your Honor.
Judge: Okay.
Mr. Henzo: Did Andrew provide ever... Any conversations with Andrew, did he ever talk about what it was like being in West Texas?
Tommy Williamso...: [04:47:30] No, not to me. No.
Mr. Henzo: You indicated that there was a time period where you lost contact with Andrew, is that right?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: And you said that was three months?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Was that unusual in your relationship with Andrew that you wouldn't speak for that long?
Tommy Williamso...: Is that what?
Mr. Henzo: Was that unusual in your relationship with Andrew that the two of you wouldn't speak for three months?
Tommy Williamso...: Oh, yes.
Mr. Henzo: [04:48:00] Did the defendant ever tell you about his business dealings in Ohio?
Tommy Williamso...: Just that he was going up there to start a restaurant.
Mr. Henzo: And did he tell you anything about who that was with?
Tommy Williamso...: No.
Mr. Henzo: Did he tell you anything about what, if anything, he invested in that business?
Tommy Williamso...: Just... [04:48:30] He did tell me one time that he took the 401 and put it in there.
Mr. Henzo: Do you have any idea, did he ever tell you how much money?
Tommy Williamso...: I think he said it was around $90,000.
Mr. Henzo: Did he ever tell you that that business deal took a negative turn?
Tommy Williamso...: You know, it's been so long. I can't remember. [04:49:00] To the best of my knowledge, I can't remember that.
Mr. Henzo: Did he ever speak to you about being taken off the bank account there?
Tommy Williamso...: No.
Mr. Henzo: Do you recall hearing about the murders that occurred up here in Ohio?
Tommy Williamso...: [04:49:30] Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Do you recall ever asking the defendant about that?
Tommy Williamso...: Yes.
Mr. Henzo: Do you remember when that was?
Tommy Williamso...: That was that three months that he called when he came back from getting out of jail in Houston.
Mr. Henzo: And did you-
Mr. Schmansky: Your Honor, I object. I need to approach.
Judge: All right.
Ladies and gentlemen of [04:52:00] the jury, you've heard this witness testify about Mr. Griffin being released from incarceration in Houston. At the request of the parties, that testimony is hereby [04:52:30] stricken. When I strike something, you're not to consider it for any purpose going forward. Mr. Kinser.
Mr. Henzo: Thank you, Your Honor. Mr. Williamson, you mentioned that you had a conversation with the defendant about the murders, is that correct?
Tommy Williamso...: I just asked him if he'd done what the rumors were.
Mr. Henzo: And how did he respond to you?
Tommy Williamso...: He said, "Tommy, I can't talk to you about it [04:53:00] over the telephone. They're listening to every word I say." And that was that. That's when I lost all contact with him because I blocked him and I told him, I said, "Andrew, we're done. Don't come around me or nothing anymore."
Mr. Henzo: Was that the-
Tommy Williamso...: And that was it.
Mr. Henzo: Was that the end of your relationship with him?
Tommy Williamso...: That was it.
Mr. Henzo: I can only ask you if you know anything from personal knowledge. Did you personally know anything, have any personal [04:53:30] knowledge of him leaving the country? Not what you heard from third parties, but did you personally know that?
Tommy Williamso...: I didn't know nothing about it at all. Matter of fact-
Mr. Schmansky: Object.
Tommy Williamso...: I was on the phone-
Mr. Schmansky: Object.
Judge: Mr. Williamson, hold on. Hold on.
Mr. Schmansky: Non-responsive. I'd like to approach again, please.
Judge: All right.
Mr. Henzo: [04:55:00] Mr. Williamson, did the defendant ever tell you where he was during those three months that you lost contact with him?
Tommy Williamso...: No, sir.
Mr. Henzo: Okay.
Judge: And the parties need to approach.
[04:56:00] Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this witness also testified that Mr. Griffin ran off and went to Mexico for several months. This witness testified to that and he has no firsthand knowledge. Therefore, his testimony on that issue [04:56:30] is hereby stricken. Once again, you're not to consider those comments or testimony for any purpose at all. Mr. Kinser.
Mr. Henzo: When [04:57:00] Mr. Griffin lost contact with you for three months-
PART 9 OF 13 ENDS [04:57:04]
Speaker 14: Mr. Griffin lost contact with you for three months. Did you ever take any action to locate him?
Mr. Williamson: No. We talked about going and looking for him, but we didn't.
Speaker 14: How did you interpret his response to your question about the murders?
Mr. Shamansky: Object, your honor. His interpretation is not relevant to anything.
Speaker 15: Approach.
Speaker 14: [05:00:00] State has no further questions, Your Honor.
Speaker 15: All right. Mr. Shamansky, do you wish to undertake any cross-examination?
Mr. Shamansky: I do. Thank you, Your Honor. May I proceed, sir?
Speaker 15: Yes, you may.
Mr. Shamansky: Mr. Williamson, can you hear me okay?
Mr. Williamson: Yes, sir.
Mr. Shamansky: So you drive all over the state of Oklahoma, [05:00:30] correct?
Mr. Williamson: Yes, sir.
Mr. Shamansky: And in so doing, you're keeping an eye on hundreds and maybe thousands of oil rigs all over the state?
Mr. Williamson: Oh, not that many, no.
Mr. Shamansky: About how many do you figure?
Mr. Williamson: Oh, there's probably just 80.
Mr. Shamansky: How many, sir?
Mr. Williamson: 80.
Mr. Shamansky: 80. Okay. So you're on the road how many days a week?
Mr. Williamson: Five.
Mr. Shamansky: All right. And you drive all around in that-
Mr. Williamson: [05:01:00] I don't make those 80 wells every day.
Mr. Shamansky: I'm sorry, sir?
Mr. Williamson: I don't make those 80 wells every day.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay.
Mr. Williamson: I got a bunch of pumpers that work under me.
Mr. Shamansky: And so you're on site every day, right?
Mr. Williamson: No.
Mr. Shamansky: Well, you said you drove all over the state. Is that incorrect or correct?
Mr. Williamson: I did drive all over the state, but not every day.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. [05:01:30] A couple of days a week or how's that work?
Mr. Williamson: Two or three days a week.
Mr. Shamansky: All right. And do you get out of your car?
Mr. Williamson: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And what do you do when you get on site? You walk around?
Mr. Williamson: I look things over.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. But what I'm asking you, sir, is do you get out of your car and walk around the oil field site?
Mr. Williamson: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. Do you ever have to get off the ground?
Mr. Williamson: Yeah, I have to go up the tank battery.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. All right. [05:02:00] Now, you of course remember speaking to law enforcement, right?
Mr. Williamson: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And you knew when you were speaking to law enforcement that they were investigating an extremely serious crime, correct?
Mr. Williamson: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And in reviewing your interview, you knew that the details were extraordinarily important, correct?
Mr. Williamson: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: I'm sorry, sir?
Mr. Williamson: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay. And [05:02:30] you know that part of being truthful means being thorough, right?
Mr. Williamson: Yes.
Mr. Shamansky: And you were completely thorough when you spoke to Detective Oller, right?
Mr. Williamson: Pretty much.
Mr. Shamansky: Well, it's either you were or you weren't. Now-
Mr. Williamson: Yeah, I was.
Mr. Shamansky: Okay, good. And you recall when you were asked about this last issue that Mr. Kinsler referenced about you asking [05:03:00] Andrew if he'd been involved in this crime, you told the detective, and you correct me if I'm wrong, can you hear me all right?
Mr. Williamson: I can hear you fine.
Mr. Shamansky: Good. It's hard to tell when you're over video. This is new to me. You said, "And then he comes back and he calls me. And so I asked him about it and he said, I can't talk about it on the phone." You remember making that statement?
Mr. Williamson: Yes, sir. I do.
Mr. Shamansky: That's all I have. Thanks, Judge.
Speaker 15: Any redirect?
Speaker 14: No, Your Honor.
Speaker 15: Thank you. May this witness be released?
Speaker 14: [05:03:30] Yes.
Speaker 15: Mr. Williamson, thank you for appearing via Zoom. You are released at this time.
Mr. Williamson: Thank you.
Speaker 15: Is the state of Ohio ready to proceed with their next witness?
Speaker 14: Your Honor, can we have a break before our next witness? I believe he is en route here and we have to set up some exhibits for him. He's a crime scene [05:04:00] investigator and he will be testifying for a little while. We've got to set up some physical exhibits for him.
Speaker 15: How much time are you seeking?
Speaker 14: 15 minutes, Your Honor.
Speaker 15: Mr. Shamansky?
Mr. Shamansky: Nope. Whatever they need, Judge, is fine.
Speaker 15: Okay. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we're going to take a recess for 15 minutes. Remember my orders are still in place, but hopefully it won't be longer than 15 minutes. We'll have you back in this courtroom. Thank you.
[05:05:00] We're outside the presence of the jury. Before we take this recess, any issues the state needs to address?
Speaker 14: No, Judge.
Speaker 15: Mr. Shamansky?
Mr. Shamansky: No, sir. Thank you.
Speaker 15: All right. Court will be in recess at this time.
PART 10 OF 13 ENDS [05:30:04]
Judge: Everyone [05:34:00] be seated. All right, we're back on the record in State of Ohio [05:34:30] versus Andrew Griffin. Mr. Griffin is present in the courtroom with his counsel. The State of Ohio is represented, and the jury is present in the courtroom. Mr. Vavra, it is still the State's case-in-chief. Are you ready for your next witness?
Mr. Vavra: Yes, Judge. State calls Matt Austin.
Court Clerk: [05:35:00] Just step there. Step facing me. Raise your right hand, please. Do you swear the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Matt Austin: I swear.
Court Clerk: [inaudible 05:35:14].
Judge: And sir, do you have any objection to being billed?
Matt Austin: No.
Judge: All right. Mr. Kinsler, you may proceed.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you, Your Honor. Sir, will you please state your name for [05:35:30] the record?
Matt Austin: My name is Matthew Austin, A-U-S-T-I-N.
Mr. Kinsler: Where do you work?
Matt Austin: I work for the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation, referred to as BCI for short.
Mr. Kinsler: How long have you worked with BCI?
Matt Austin: I've worked there for nearly seven years, six of which were in the crime scene unit, and I just recently transferred to our special investigations unit.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. In your time as a crime scene investigator, what sort of stuff did you do?
Matt Austin: Our main responsibility [05:36:00] in that role is an assist agency, so we help sheriff's departments and police departments with processing crime scenes. It takes a lot of time and equipment and expertise to be good at some of the things that you need to do in a crime scene, and so smaller agencies or even medium-sized agencies can't just devote that time. We get called for help and we're kind of a subcontractor to help with just the processing of crime scenes. That's taking tons of photos, doing things like sketches, maps [05:36:30] if necessary, doing 3D scans, taking measurements, doing processing, and then also just collecting packaging evidence.
Mr. Kinsler: Prior to your time with BCI, did you have any other jobs in law enforcement?
Matt Austin: Yes. Before coming to BCI, I was a patrolman and then a detective at the Ohio University Police Department in Athens, Ohio, and I was a detective there for six years. So a total of eight six years investigations before coming to BCI.
Mr. Kinsler: Did you receive any sort of training to become a law enforcement officer?
Matt Austin: [05:37:00] Yes. Prior to being hired at OUPD, I did my basic academy, which was a couple-month-long residential police academy.
Mr. Kinsler: In order to do your work as a crime scene investigator, did you get any special training for that?
Matt Austin: Yes. As I mentioned, it takes a lot of time and training. It would be hard to list all of them, but some of the highlights would be a three-month residential academy at the University of Tennessee, that was again like a mini-college course, [05:37:30] numerous 40-hour classes on basic shooting, advanced shooting reconstruction, again, multiple 40-hour chunks just on bloodstain and blood stain pattern recognition, along with numerous multi-day classes on anything from photography to fingerprinting. There's a lot of training and continuing ed.
Mr. Kinsler: In your time as a crime scene investigator for BCI, do you recall being called to an arson that took place on Trails End Drive in Belmont, Ohio?
Matt Austin: Yes, I do.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:38:00] Okay. If I told you that took place September 21st, 2021, would that sound right to you?
Matt Austin: That sounds right.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Do you have any idea what time of day you would've arrived?
Matt Austin: It was morning. I remember the call came in in the morning, so mid, late morning probably by the time I got there.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. By the time you arrived, what was the condition of the house?
Matt Austin: There were a lot of first responders there, to include law enforcement and fire. I remember crime scene tape being up. Like I said, there were police cruisers or sheriff's cruisers. There were fire trucks that were kind of working on packing [05:38:30] up, crime scene tape was
up securing the scene, there were tarps over the roof, but there were still a lot of things still happening.
Mr. Kinsler: I'm going to show him that exhibit. Your Honor, may I approach?
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: I'm going to show him State's Exhibit 135. I believe that's his report, an eight-page report by this witness.
Judge: Yes, sir.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you. Do [05:39:00] you recognize Exhibit 135?
Matt Austin: Yes, I do. This was the report that I authored to document the collection efforts and processing that was done for this case.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:39:30] You indicated you arrived and there were other first responders on scene, correct?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: What do you do when you arrive on a scene like this?
Matt Austin: Really the first thing is to get a brief report or intel collection of what happened here. We take all of that with a big grain of salt because things are complex and fluid and sometimes A is not A once you dig into it five hours later, but we need some basis of, is this a sexual assault case [05:40:00] and we're looking for potential fluids? Is this a shooting case and we're looking for bullet holes? Kind of an overall view of what the case is at that point. Then once that information is gathered, starting to just preserve the scene, remove people that don't need to be from the scene or in the scene, and then just starting to document its condition as soon as possible once I arrive.
Mr. Kinsler: I [05:40:30] mentioned that this was an arson. What did the outside of the house look like when you arrived?
Matt Austin: I remember portions of the roof missing. I don't recall if that was the front half or the back half of the house, but there was the smell of smoke in the air, there was burning or singeing, and I definitely remember tarps over the roof.
Mr. Kinsler: Does a fire create challenges for you in collecting evidence?
Matt Austin: [05:41:00] Yes, for sure. One, in the perfect crime scene sense, we would never let anybody go into a scene to include first responders, just because the more people that go in, the more chance for contamination, things like shoe prints or fingerprints, a second set of shoe prints from a cop over the bad guy print, well, now that print is gone. We would love it if no one ever entered a scene. That doesn't happen almost ever, but you add fire and you've now got firefighters in there, [05:41:30] they're not worried about shoe prints and fingerprints, they're worried about saving lives and putting out fire. Same thing with EMS. If they respond, they're worried about saving lives. And then law enforcement has a dual purpose, to save lives, preserve the scene, but also collect and preserve evidence if possible. So fire, A, makes things really complicated in terms of people.
Then you add potential damage from smoke or heat or fire that can certainly alter and change things. I've had cases where we think [05:42:00] we know who the decedents are, but the fire was so hot and so intense that we can't identify them. The bones and the teeth are so destroyed, we can't even figure out who people are. So fire can certainly be very damaging and it also creates safety hazards sometimes when houses are falling down and, yeah, they make our job harder in a nutshell.
Mr. Kinsler: At some point you enter the home, is that correct?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Prior to that, have the firefighters kind of done their job?
Matt Austin: Yes. Yes. I don't know at what [05:42:30] time initial responders would've been there, but we're talking hours between initial things and my response.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Fair to say for safety's sake, the fire's got to be taken care of before you enter?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Speaking of, we talked about the challenges that come with fire. Is it a challenge to locate DNA evidence in a fire?
Matt Austin: It certainly can be. DNA can come in different forms, whether it's blood, saliva, skin [05:43:00] cells from touch DNA. Heat will damage all of those things.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay.
Matt Austin: Or can.
Mr. Kinsler: Same question for water. Does water damage those things?
Matt Austin: Yes. Yes. We often joke that if we were going to commit crime, we would use bleach and a pressure washer. Water can damage all of that stuff.
Mr. Kinsler: I guess you've addressed it, but what does bleach do to DNA evidence?
Matt Austin: Bleach will also kill the cells that contain the DNA. We use bleach to clean our equipment after a scene. [05:43:30] We wipe down our shoes and our cameras and our tripods with bleach.
Mr. Kinsler: What about people like first responders who are on the scene before you touching surfaces where DNA might be?
Matt Austin: Again, in the perfect world, that wouldn't happen, but it's quite common that we're collecting standards from a lot of other people to eliminate. If we find a DNA profile, we don't know if it's victim, suspect or law enforcement. Sometimes we have to go collect 20 more samples to try to figure out who left something. [05:44:00] So yeah, certainly it can complicate the issue.
Mr. Kinsler: In your experience, do fire departments introduce bleach into the scene?
Matt Austin: Yes, and this case is where I learned that. The house had a faint odor of bleach that I noticed throughout processing, which to me initially indicated cleanup attempts. I've seen that before where suspects will allegedly use bleach to try to destroy DNA. But in talking with firefighters on scene and the fire investigator, I learned on [05:44:30] this case that the fire trucks that contain water, instead of using the hydrant to pump it, will put some bleach in the tank so that the water doesn't get gross and turn into scuzz and pond film and stuff. In effect, the fire department in this case used bleach and a pressure washer to help put out the fire.
Mr. Kinsler: Now I asked you those questions in the context of bleach, or excuse me, in the context of DNA. Are those same things make it difficult to collect fingerprints?
Matt Austin: [05:45:00] Yes, they can. Fingerprints might survive a little better, but enough water pressure could certainly alter ridge detail.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Does bleach in any way impair fingerprints?
Matt Austin: No.
Mr. Kinsler: Would heat in any way impair fingerprints?
Matt Austin: It could. I'm not a fingerprint expert, but a certain amount of heat at some point probably wouldn't alter the fingerprint, but it would destroy the item that the fingerprint was on, making it uncollectable.
Mr. Kinsler: When you're collecting a fingerprint, like a latent [05:45:30] print, what is that latent print made of?
Matt Austin: It is made of oils and skin cells, which are susceptible to heat.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. I think you mentioned there's never a perfect scene, but in the most perfect scene, is there necessarily DNA evidence left behind?
Matt Austin: No. It's a likelihood, but it's not a guarantee. There's a lot of individual factors [05:46:00] among the human population in terms of, if you're a sweater, if you're a shedder, people will call it, we could all touch the same thing and maybe in 50% of the time there would be touch DNA. It's not a guarantee. That's different from blood or saliva or semen. The DNA is probably going to be there, but specific to touch DNA, it's a gamble.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you wear gloves on a crime scene?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you wear anything on your feet on [05:46:30] a crime scene?
Matt Austin: Not all the time, but if it's a case where there is a likelihood for suspect shoe prints, we will process those sooner than later and yes, cover our tread while doing that.
Mr. Kinsler: What is the purpose of covering your tread?
Matt Austin: To eliminate the need to do more elimination work later.
Mr. Kinsler: Is it so you don't contaminate the scene with your footprint?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Same question for gloves. Why do you wear gloves on the scene?
Matt Austin: Both for our safety, coming into contact with unknown fluids, but also [05:47:00] to eliminate, "Oh, I found a fingerprint. Did I touch that an hour ago?" By wearing gloves, we just take that off the table.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Does your wearing gloves prevent you from leaving prints and DNA?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: As part of your work, do you photograph the scene?
Matt Austin: Yes. We take a lot of photographs.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:47:30] I'm sorry, you take photographs of the scene?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Judge, I'm going to begin showing them photographs beginning with 135A.
Mr. Shamansky: Your Honor, this is without objection and they're stipulated as to authentication and admissibility.
Judge: 135A through what, Mr. Kinsler?
Mr. Kinsler: [05:48:00] I don't think I'm... One moment, Your Honor.
Judge: Sure.
Mr. Kinsler: I believe I go... I'm going to take that, sorry. [05:48:30] Thank you. Judge, we are going to be going from 135A, A through Z, and then it'll be AA through ZZ. It'll be AAA through ZZZ, and then ultimately AAAA through LLLL.
Judge: Mr. Shamansky, did [05:49:00] you get all of those?
Mr. Shamansky: Yes, Your Honor, but could we just approach really quickly?
Judge: Yes. So Mr. Shamansky, we're-
Mr. Shamansky: We're [05:50:30] good right now, Your Honor. Thank you.
Judge: Okay.
Mr. Shamansky: And whichever crime scene photos and evidence collected, we're fine with publication to the jury.
Judge: All right. I just want to make sure, I have 35A through Z, AA, ZZ, AAA to ZZZ, [05:51:00] and then AAAA to LLLL. Is that right?
Mr. Kinsler: That is correct, Judge, but I may have misheard you. Did you say 35? It's 135.
Judge: 135. If I misspoke, I apologize. I have 135. All of those, Mr. Shamansky, you're stipulating to their authenticity?
Mr. Shamansky: Yes, sir.
Judge: Okay. All right, you may proceed.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you, Your Honor. Mr. Austin, do you have a pointer up there?
Matt Austin: No, I do not.
Mr. Kinsler: May I approach, Your Honor?
Judge: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:51:30] Mr. Austin, I think there's a screen to your right, if that's easier for you to see, but when you do point things out, if you don't mind pointing them out up to us on the screen when I get the photos up there. So you take photos of the scene, correct?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:52:00] Do you recognize what's been marked as State's Exhibit 135A?
Matt Austin: Yes. This is the front of the house from the roadway.
Mr. Kinsler: What is the first thing you photograph when you get on scene?
Matt Austin: It varies, but typically we try to work from outside to inside while also observing, making observations, and if we see something transient, dealing with it right away. It wouldn't make any sense to go deep into the house to take your first picture [05:52:30] because you've walked past who knows what.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. What was the first thing you did at this house?
Matt Austin: I basically did a 360 around the house from about this distance, just to document its condition.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135B, what are we looking at?
Matt Austin: This would be rotating counterclockwise, so to the right of the front of the house. This is the side of the house showing the backyard.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:53:00] 135C.
Matt Austin: We're still continuing counterclockwise. This is from the corner of the fence. I-70 is just kind of down this hill. Sorry about the reflection there. This is the back patio. There's a sliding door, or no, glass doors to the back of the house, and then here's some of the tarps that I mentioned remembering over the roof.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135D, do you [05:53:30] recognize that?
Matt Austin: Yes, I do. This is the back of the house, more of a straight-on photograph showing those back doors, the patio, and then some tarps. This canopy had been set up, I was told by first responders or the coroner's office, and the two decedents are here on the back porch.
Mr. Kinsler: At this juncture, did it rain while you were there?
Matt Austin: On and off. I know it had rained while I was driving up.
Mr. Kinsler: Where were you driving from?
Matt Austin: From [05:54:00] Athens County.
Mr. Kinsler: Exhibit 135E, do you recognize that?
Matt Austin: I do, and this would be the left side of the house.
Mr. Kinsler: 135F, what are we looking at here?
Matt Austin: This photograph is from either the base or halfway up the stairs on the front of the house. We're looking at the open front door, water on the porch, and a fire hose extended through [05:54:30] the front door.
Mr. Kinsler: All right. Can we see damage to that door or adjacent to that door?
Matt Austin: Yes. You'll see on the right, the glass is intact and on the left here, it's damaged, and the glass is missing.
Mr. Kinsler: Judge, could you inquire the jury if the jurors on the right side can see if I'm standing up here?
Judge: Is anyone having any difficulty seeing what's on the screen? Please raise your right hand. No one has done so.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you.
Judge: Thank you, though, for inquiring, Mr. Kinsler.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:55:00] State's Exhibit 135G.
Matt Austin: The home had a large front porch. This is from the left side of the porch looking across the extent of the porch.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember what was the condition of this window next to the rocking chair?
Matt Austin: Yes. This window had damage to it. The screen was removed or was out of place and on the floor of the porch.
Mr. Kinsler: That all took place before you arrived?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:55:30] I'm sorry. State's Exhibit 135H.
Matt Austin: This photograph is now just into the front door. There was that photograph showing the open front door, this would be just a couple steps forward. We're looking into the living room from here.
Another thing that makes arson scenes hard, back to earlier questions, everything is black, which makes it hard to take good photographs because the black soot [05:56:00] absorbs all the light. It's hard to get photographs to look properly exposed in arson scene.
Mr. Kinsler: Was the power on in the home when you arrived?
Matt Austin: No, it was not.
Mr. Kinsler: So no. Was there any interior lighting or did you have to add interior-
Matt Austin: We added scene lighting.
Mr. Kinsler: State's 135I.
Matt Austin: This is a couple more steps into the front door of the home. To the left was a set of stairs that led upstairs. You can see the open door, [05:56:30] and this is that rear door on the back of the house that led to the patio, and you can see a little bit of the canopy that was set up.
Mr. Kinsler: State's 135J.
Matt Austin: This is now kind of finishing the loop, but now we're on the back of the house, just pointing in the opposite direction of the prior photo. So about to enter the back porch, you can see a silver body bag on the left and another silver body bag on the right between the banisters.
Mr. Kinsler: [05:57:00] 135K.
Matt Austin: This photograph is from the garage, which is at the front of the house. The left door was open when I arrived. There were two vehicles in the garage, and this is just showing a portion of the garage. There's also a deceased dog in the back corner of the garage, and you can see just an example of that, not damage, but complications of the scene. The garage floor is dark [05:57:30] with soot, and all of those are a myriad of footprints that are not mine, so unaccounted-for footprints.
Mr. Kinsler: 135L.
Matt Austin: This is a couple feet closer. We're getting a little bit of the rear of the second car, and then here is the deceased dog in the corner of the garage.
Mr. Kinsler: Are there actually two dogs in that photo?
Matt Austin: I remember there being two [05:58:00] dogs. I don't remember if they were next to each other or if the other one is elsewhere in the garage, but there were two deceased dogs.
Mr. Kinsler: I'm having a hard time making it out myself. Would you look to the one on your right there? Can you see?
Matt Austin: Yes. It might be helpful if we can dim lights. I don't know if that makes a difference, but...
Judge: Lights are here.
Mr. Kinsler: With the court's permission, could we dim maybe these right above us?
Judge: There's no dimming. They either come on or off.
Mr. Shamansky: Do you want me to stipulate that there's two dogs in that photo?
Mr. Vavra: That's fine.
Mr. Shamansky: [05:58:30] Judge, we'll stipulate there's two deceased dogs regrettably in that photo.
Judge: Okay.
Matt Austin: And now that I've refreshed my memory, you can see maybe there's kind of a dark and a light brown dog. This dog's back is touching the garage door, if that helps you kind of pick it up in the photograph.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135M.
Matt Austin: This is a photograph from the garage door [05:59:00] showing the rear of one of the two vehicles in the garage.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135N.
Matt Austin: This is items in storage that were in the rear corner of the garage.
Mr. Kinsler: When you say rear corner, imagine I'm standing... If you're standing facing that open garage door, which side are we talking about?
Matt Austin: Back wall to the right.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you remember, is there a doggy door [05:59:30] on this house?
Matt Austin: There is, and it was on this back wall of the garage. It was blocked. It was not in operation. Whether it's here or further to the left, there were items blocking the dog door that would've allowed the dogs to go into the backyard.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Can we see that photo from the back of the house?
Matt Austin: We should be able to. [06:00:00] It is off-screen, but it is to the left over by this area, like one of those flap-style doors.
Mr. Kinsler: Was there anything on the outside of the house?
Matt Austin: Not that I remember.
Mr. Kinsler: And I should have asked, there's not anything on the outside of the house that's preventing that door from working?
Matt Austin: What I remember is stuff inside the garage prevented the door from working.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you. [06:00:30] State's 135O.
Matt Austin: This is from the back porch, just kind of showing the overall doorframe, suspected blood stains, fire hose, and the threshold of the door between the inside and the outside.
Mr. Kinsler: 135P.
Matt Austin: This is then kind of a mid-range photograph. We [06:01:00] tend to do a lot of almost duplicate photos, but we move closer in. That last picture, you couldn't see detail. If I just started with this picture, we might not know where we were. So this is then just a more detailed photograph of the threshold between the porch and the back of the house.
Mr. Kinsler: 135Q.
Matt Austin: This is then starting to enter the home. We're looking to the right here. This is the open door. Then we've got suspected blood stains [06:01:30] with what looks like drag marks through the blood stains. There's lots of sooty footprints and there's furniture in various states of what appears to be burn damage.
Mr. Kinsler: Is there a piece of furniture in the top left of this photo?
Matt Austin: Yes. There's a coffee table or end table-type piece of furniture. And then it's hard to see in this photograph, but we're starting to see the burnt remnants of a couch.
Mr. Kinsler: State's 135R.
Matt Austin: [06:02:00] This is then just panning to the left now and we're seeing the same things on the floor. I believe it was either an L-shaped couch or two different couches in the shape of an L, but this is the left couch, which is not burnt, but starts to have some smoke damage, an ottoman, and there's some items on the couch.
Mr. Kinsler: State's 135S.
Matt Austin: [06:02:30] This is kind of the last photograph in that sequence I talked about. This is a closeup of something with important detail. It's really hard to read, but that's LP for latent print. That's our shorthand for this is a photograph of a suspected latent print. This is a scaled sticker in case lab people need to do measurements, and then this is either a suspected fingerprint or suspected smudge on one of the white doors to the house.
Mr. Kinsler: [06:03:00] Did you attempt to take latent prints in more...
PART 11 OF 13 ENDS [06:03:04]
Speaker 16: Did you attempt to take latent prints in more than this location?
Matt Austin: Yes. I would have to refer to a report for specifics, but on a case like this, in many cases, we are processing places of entry or exit for both touch DNA or potential touch DNA and potential fingerprints. These are places that people likely come and go from.
Speaker 16: When you do this, what is that process? Explain it to the jury.
Matt Austin: So, first, it's just visual [06:03:30] examination. You've probably all seen in TV or the movies, the fingerprint powder. But if you can see the fingerprint with your naked eye, you don't need powder to develop it or find it. So, first, it's a visual search with a flashlight, and sometimes we can just find stuff right there. Then it's a combination of swabbing for touch DNA or dusting for latent prints, in combination or tandem. Smudges are typically better for touch DNA, because if I can see [06:04:00] what looks like a drag mark, there's probably not good ridge detail. So, this was probably swabbed, maybe photographed. Sometimes we do both.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135T.
Matt Austin: This is back in the living room. That's the coffee table we saw a little earlier. And you can see just the beginnings of a very burnt couch. You can see some of the skeleton framework here. And again, [06:04:30] suspected blood on the floor, fire hoses, and sooty footprints on the floor.
Speaker 16: State's 135U.
Matt Austin: Again, turning to the left, this is the unburnt couch. Here you can see one of the many different scene lights we set up. So, this was not present in the scene. We added it. And that's part of why we tell the story in photographs. The very first photos are unaltered at all, and then we start having to do things. [06:05:00] And so, the photographs tell that story.
Speaker 16: 135V.
Matt Austin: This is paying attention to the floor in between the burnt couch, which is on the right. The bulk of the suspected blood on the floor was in this area by the couch. And then the fire hose really points to that open back door. So, this is the area of interest in this photograph.
Speaker 16: [06:05:30] Let me ask you, why is that a point of interest to you?
Matt Austin: So, the only blood or suspected blood observed in the scene was really between this area on the right and this back door, which tells us or tells me that there's not bleeding events elsewhere in the house. Can't prove that, but it's a very good inclination that injuries didn't happen in a far back bedroom if the blood is in a totally different room and only limited to that area.
Speaker 16: [06:06:00] State's 135W.
Matt Austin: This is again looking towards the left of the living room. You can start to see more of the burnt couch compared to the unburnt couch.
Speaker 16: Again, where is the back door relative to this?
Matt Austin: So, the red hose goes right out the back door.
Speaker 16: State's 135X.
Matt Austin: Now, basically, [06:06:30] in the same location we're looking straight down, this is the edge of the burnt couch. There is the largest area of suspected blood on the floor, some of which is burnt and singed. I'm sure there's more photographs, but there's a large collection of burnt and unburnt US currency on the right of this photograph, along with some suspected clothing items.
Speaker 16: Same question as before. Where [06:07:00] would the back door be relative to this photo?
Matt Austin: The back door would be to the left and this blue hose snakes out to the right, out the front door.
Speaker 16: 135Y. What are we looking at?
Matt Austin: Essentially, the same area, but just shows in reference, here's that back door with the red hose. This is the suspected clothing and burnt currency, and now we're starting to see the back frame of the burnt couch.
Speaker 16: [06:07:30] State's 135Z. Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. And this is from essentially the exact same spot. We're now just looking up, seeing the smoke damage to the wall, the ceiling, the full back door, and the top rail of the burnt couch.
Speaker 16: State's 135AA.
Matt Austin: Now we're standing more towards the front of the house. With my back to the front door, we can now see the entire [06:08:00] rear frame of the couch and the open back door.
Speaker 16: State's 135BB.
Matt Austin: We're still circling around the living room. This is the unburnt couch. And there were items, such as a, I think partially or maybe empty beer can, a phone, and a case, along with a vape, and maybe a blanket near this area of the unburnt couch. [06:08:30] This is that mid-range photograph, the same items I just described.
Speaker 16: Sorry, if I can stop you. Let me identify the exhibit. This is 135CC, please.
Matt Austin: Sorry. I was getting ahead of myself. This is that mid-range photograph, showing in better detail the things that I was just describing that you could see in the previous photo. Items to include, a pair of glasses on the little end table next to the couch.
Speaker 16: 135DD.
Matt Austin: [06:09:00] This photograph is from that same area. Now looking to the left of the home, the front door is on the left, the back door is on the right, and we're looking towards the master bedroom.
Speaker 16: 135EE.
Matt Austin: This is now rotating to the left. The front door is here. The stairs going upstairs are in the back of the photo and the hallway leading to the back bedroom [06:09:30] would be off camera just to the right.
Speaker 16: State's 135FF.
Matt Austin: This is just a mid-range photograph of a decorative table that was in the front foyer area. Anytime that there's names just to help identify or if there's mail, we'll often grab photographs of things like that.
Speaker 16: 135GG.
Matt Austin: So, the kitchen, it's a fairly open concept [06:10:00] house, but the kitchen is directly connected to the living room. This is the kitchen with a L-shaped kitchen island. The stove and fridge are off camera to the right. And just in the photograph is the garage door. The attached garage is connected to the kitchen.
Speaker 16: 135HH.
Matt Austin: This would be rotating to the left. Here's the open garage door. There's a little [06:10:30] breakfast nook, for the lack of a better term, off the kitchen. Dog watering and food area. And again, very sooty, dirty floor with all kinds of footprints all over them.
Speaker 16: The door to the garage, is there an opening on that?
Matt Austin: I don't remember, but looking at the photograph, I do see what appears to be a dog door or a pet door in the door.
Speaker 16: 135II.
Matt Austin: [06:11:00] This is another photograph of the kitchen, with more attention paid to the island, fridge, sink, stove area.
Speaker 16: We talked about this, I think early on, but what do you see on the floor there?
Matt Austin: Footprints.
Speaker 16: Were those all present when you arrive?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Speaker 16: Okay. 135JJ.
Matt Austin: This is that small breakfast nook directly attached to the kitchen.
Speaker 16: [06:11:30] 135KK.
Matt Austin: This is a photograph of the door that connects the kitchen to the garage, along with a connected pantry area.
Speaker 16: 135LL.
Matt Austin: This is another photograph of the kitchen. Standing at the door, so the garage is just to my left, looking back towards the kitchen. [06:12:00] Again, the dirty gray floor versus the footprints are allowing me to start to make some inferences on where firefighters or first responders went and didn't go, because at this point, no one has stepped in the soot in this area.
Speaker 16: 135MM.
Matt Austin: A very similar location, just panning to the right. We're now seeing the kitchen to the left and we're seeing the living room. And that back [06:12:30] rectangle would be leading back to the bedroom.
Speaker 16: 135NN.
Matt Austin: This is a mid-range photograph of that L-shaped kitchen island. Both inventorying and starting to do searching. There were a fair number of these zipper bank money bags throughout the house, which were ultimately photographed and then collected as potential pieces of evidence.
Speaker 16: Okay. Also, on there, there's a white box. Do you know what [06:13:00] that was?
Matt Austin: It was a home security system or surveillance camera type setup that was still in the packaging.
Speaker 16: To your knowledge, did the house have any surveillance video equipment?
Matt Austin: Not that I know of. No.
Speaker 16: Okay. State's Exhibit 135OO.
Matt Austin: So, now we're in the main kitchen area. Again, this is as I found it. There was a bottle, a glass bottle on the stove top, along with a pot, and then this [06:13:30] cupboard door was found open.
Speaker 16: And that's the case when you arrive on scene, correct?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Speaker 16: Do you have any idea when that door would've been opened?
Matt Austin: No.
Speaker 16: 135PP.
Matt Austin: Okay. In this photograph, we've left the kitchen, we've gone through the living room, and this is essentially from the living room looking into the bedroom. So, there was a small closet to the left and just off to the right is [06:14:00] a bathroom. In the very far foreground is the master bedroom.
Speaker 16: And I'm sorry, what is this area right here?
Matt Austin: This, I believe, was a closet, but there was fairly significant burn damage in this area.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit QQ.
Matt Austin: So, across from that small closet with a substantial amount of damage, directly across the hallway was this bathroom, which you can see here.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit RR.
Matt Austin: [06:14:30] So, in the bathroom, there's a fair amount of smoke damage. There were two shoes or slippers right in front of the toilet, a towel, and then a cell phone that was later collected right here on the edge of the counter.
Speaker 16: Is there another pair of shoes up on the sink?
Matt Austin: Yes. These are white New Balance tennis shoes.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135SS.
Matt Austin: [06:15:00] This is standing at the doorway to that back master bedroom. There are more of those blue money bags at the foot of the bed. I remember there being bundles of receipts. The mattress was in disarray. And again, there was an area of burning in this area, the corner of the bed.
Speaker 16: State's 135TT.
Matt Austin: This photograph shows a couple steps more into the bedroom. You can [06:15:30] see the partially burnt box spring, some melted bedding, and then disruption melted curtains inside the bedroom.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135UU.
Matt Austin: This photograph is very similar to the previous one. We're just a little bit closer, so you can see more detail. Pair of shoes, you can see the balled up receipts or folded up receipts, and then these blue bank bags [06:16:00] on the floor.
Speaker 16: 135VV.
Matt Austin: This is turning left from the bedroom door, a television on a dresser, and these dresser drawers were open when I got there. Again, I don't know when they were open, but I do know that for us, that's a clue that they were disturbed, especially in a house that's fairly clean and put together. So, swabs for potential touch DNA were collected from these knobs, with [06:16:30] the suggestion that someone may have touched them.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135WW.
Matt Austin: This is that same partially burnt corner of the bed. Just a little closer, you're able to see a little more detail.
Speaker 16: 135XX.
Matt Austin: So, the right of that bed was a walk-in closet. There was an overturned Budweiser box that contained [06:17:00] bundles of receipts that looked consistent with the ones that were burnt by the bed. And I believe there were more blue money bags in the closet as well.
Speaker 16: 135YY.
Matt Austin: This is a photograph a little further inside the closet. Again, inconsistent with the rest of the house were things like purses on the floor, things in disarray. The rest of the house was fairly organized. There's a football on the ground [06:17:30] that is likely from a closet shelf. There was a box with other sports items in it. So, it appeared that something happened in this closet or there was some disruption that moved items.
Speaker 16: And do you only know that that happened before you arrived?
Matt Austin: Yes. That very well could've been firefighters, first responders, but we don't know. But we just know that something happened, so it's a focal point for us.
Speaker 16: 135ZZ.
Matt Austin: This is a little [06:18:00] more detail of that turned over Budweiser box. All of those are bundles of receipts.
Speaker 16: 135AAA.
Matt Austin: There was a bathroom connected to that master bedroom. This is the window that was broken out that we saw from the front porch. There's glass on the floor and like a makeup counter next to the sink.
Speaker 16: 135BBB.
Matt Austin: [06:18:30] So, next to the partially burnt bed was the small dresser or bedside table. This drawer was found open. And there were, I believe, two firearms inside that drawer. This one pictured is still inside the holster and there's a silver revolver that's unholstered, sitting inside that drawer.
Speaker 16: 135CCC.
Matt Austin: We're now back to the living room, that staircase to the left [06:19:00] of the front door, leading up to the second floor.
Speaker 16: What do you notice about the steps?
Matt Austin: So, consistent with the kitchen area, there's a heavy deposit of soot and then there's the gray ashy disturbance of footprints.
Speaker 16: Excuse me, 135DDD.
Matt Austin: So, the second story is kind of a loft setup, where this was open access to the front door [06:19:30] on the right and then open access to the living room where the burnt couch was on the left. In the back of the photograph is a office area.
Speaker 16: 135EEE.
Matt Austin: So, this is from that second floor, but it allowed for a top-down photograph of the back door with the fire hose, the burnt corner of the couch where there was the highest concentration of suspected blood. And then you can see [06:20:00] what appears to be drag or skid marks of the blood, leading from the couch area to the door.
Speaker 16: There's a green item on the couch. Do you know what that is?
Matt Austin: Yes. This was some form of cleanup spray. I don't recall if it contained a bleach or not, but it was some kind of all-purpose cleaning type spray.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135FF.
Matt Austin: [06:20:30] So, opposite the home office was another room. This was like a guest bedroom and there was a deceased cat located up there.
Speaker 16: What is on the floor there in addition to soot?
Matt Austin: Drywall or ceiling material.
Speaker 16: Is this in the area where the damage to the roof was?
Matt Austin: Yes. Yeah. The tarps would be above this area.
Speaker 16: Okay. 135GGG.
Matt Austin: [06:21:00] This is that guest bed. Again, you can see plaster or ceiling on the bed.
Speaker 16: 135HHH. I'm sorry.
Matt Austin: This photograph, if you turn left from the previous photograph, this was a small window. This would be facing the front of the house. And here you can see footprints, disturbance, et cetera, in the sooty carpet, leading to the window.
Speaker 16: Is the [06:21:30] window open?
Matt Austin: It's either open or broken, but there was breeze coming through it.
Speaker 16: I don't know how to describe it, but is there some debris or something there by the window or hanging off the window?
Matt Austin: Yes. Looking at this photograph closer, these look like the curtains, the venetian type blinds. Not being a firefighter, I can't say exactly, but I didn't think this was forced entry or a burglary situation. [06:22:00] This appeared to be consistent with firefighters doing what they do.
Speaker 16: 135III.
Matt Austin: This is on the second floor still. This is that home office set up. There's a little desk area, a little sitting area, and then two office chairs.
Speaker 16: 135JJJ.
Matt Austin: This is from that second floor walkway, except now we're looking at the front door side. So, here's the stairs going [06:22:30] down. This blue hose would lead right out the front door. And again, this is scene lighting that we've added. This is well into scene processing, so some things have changed from my initial observations at this point.
Speaker 16: There's a rectangular object to the left of the blue hose. Do you remember what that was?
Matt Austin: I believe it was wall art or a painting that appeared to be on the wall and then got knocked over at some point.
Speaker 16: 135KKK.
Matt Austin: [06:23:00] This is the basement of the home, which there was nothing really remarkable in the basement.
Speaker 16: Is there water present?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Speaker 16: 135LLL.
Matt Austin: So, talking about the photographing in general, all of those initial photographs are all in that first walkthrough. Something may be of interest, mental note. And then once the whole house is documented, we do a second [06:23:30] array of photographs, this time adding placards. I've already talked about the burnt money or the suspected clothing, but we take these photographs to then better tell that story. So, the inventory and the report can just say item one as shorthand for what item one ultimately was. There's no order in what these numbers are. They're not necessarily chronological or of importance. We may find something after the fact, so the numbers bounce around and don't mean a whole lot.
Speaker 16: [06:24:00] 135MMM.
Matt Austin: So, this is that mid-range closeup of what is going to be collected as item one, item two, and item three. And again, this is right at the largest area of blood and the corner of the burnt couch.
Speaker 16: And what are those three items?
Matt Austin: I'm going to have to look at my report to refresh my memory. Another work product I make is an inventory.
Speaker 16: If I would, [06:24:30] if I could stop you right here. Does, Courtney, he refresh his recollection with the report?
Courtney: I certainly don't mind.
Speaker 17: Yeah, he may.
Speaker 16: Thank you, Your Honor.
Matt Austin: Thank you. So, [06:25:00] the currency and what was later found to be a burnt wallet was collected as item one. Item two was a different cluster of currency and feathers. And then blue fabric is item three, I believe.
Speaker 16: All right.
Matt Austin: Yes. The blue fabric and a key were item three.
Speaker 16: Exhibit [06:25:30] 135NNN.
Matt Austin: This is the end table next to the unburnt couch. Item four collected was a pink phone, slash, wallet case, which had ID in it to Angela.
Speaker 16: 135OOO.
Matt Austin: So, this is a closeup of three. Sometimes an item like a phone is readily identifiable as a phone. Item three is... it took some [06:26:00] digging through the ash to really figure out what it was, but it appears to be mostly burnt pair of either pants or shorts, and then there was a key that was found under some of the debris. So, those items together become three. But when I put placard three down, I didn't know the key was there.
Speaker 16: 135PPP.
Matt Austin: This is part of item one, a folded up collection of twenties.
Speaker 16: And those are fire [06:26:30] damaged?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Speaker 16: 135QQQ.
Matt Austin: What became part of item one also is that partially burnt wallet, which contained various things, to include Angela's name, but also Tom's name as well.
Speaker 16: Well, technically, does it contain the name Tommyboy Sausage?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135RRR.
Matt Austin: So, with almost everything we collect, we also take closeups removed from the original [06:27:00] scene. In the original scene, there could be distracting backgrounds. We like to lay things out and take inventory photos. So, this is then just a closeup of that pink phone, wallet case, item four.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135SSS.
Matt Austin: So, this is the back door area of the living room floor. Just off to the left is the back door opening. I have now added yard sticks or rulers to help make the [06:27:30] photograph be potentially useful to footwear. People that do footwear comparisons, they need a frame of reference to be able to do measurements.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135TTT.
Matt Austin: This is essentially the exact same area, just a different angle, a little more top-down. In this photograph, the back door is on the right.
Speaker 16: 135UUU?
Matt Austin: [06:28:00] If you go back to the bedroom, there were two firearms in that bedside table. This is one of the two of them, the revolver, found to be fully loaded. No evidence that it had been fired recently.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135V or VVV.
Matt Austin: I think this is up in the upstairs office. I would need some of the pre-photographs to help refresh my memory. [06:28:30] But just interesting note, a large sum of money, so it was documented through photography. And the envelope reads, "Put back 29,771.09 once the house sells."
Speaker 16: Was there actually cash in that envelope?
Matt Austin: I don't believe so.
Speaker 16: Okay. State's Exhibit 135WWW.
Matt Austin: These items collected as item 10 and 11 were in the garage near the deceased dogs, I think [06:29:00] in between the two vehicles. But again, knowing that we had fire, the gas jug could be of relevance. And then smelling the bleach in the house, I collected the bleach jug as well.
Speaker 16: 135XXX.
Matt Austin: So, you can see in the background, item seven. This is kind of partway through processing item seven, which is a collection of money bags that were found on the kitchen island. [06:29:30] I'm not even sure how many, but there were multiple bags on the island. And this is just one of the inventory photographs to document, was there anything in the bag or not. And this bag is empty.
Speaker 16: 135YYY.
Matt Austin: This bag would also have been found empty.
Speaker 16: And ZZZ
Matt Austin: A different bag had some change, and that was it.
Speaker 16: And then 135AAAA.
Matt Austin: So, this is all the bags that [06:30:00] were found in the kitchen collected together as item seven. And then as I mentioned, the inventory, this is all of the contents of those bags.
Speaker 16: Okay. So, just change and no bills?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Speaker 16: What is that piece of paper up to the top right?
Matt Austin: It's a money band that I think says 1,000. It could be 100, but I think it's 1,000.
Speaker 16: 135BBBB.
Matt Austin: [06:30:30] These are more money bags. At this point, I'm guessing that these are the ones from the bedroom, but I'll need some more photographs to fully know.
Speaker 16: Okay. But you collected these blue bags from the kitchen and the bedroom?
Matt Austin: Yes. Both of those two areas had a collection of bags in different array. And they were all collected with the idea that empty money bags, there could be a theft component, there could be suspect interaction with these items, so we should collect them in case that's the issue.
Speaker 16: 135CCCC.
Matt Austin: [06:31:00] So, this is the area near... You recognize the end table, this is the collection of the largest blood, and off-screen to the right here is where the burnt couch was. So, in collaboration with the fire investigator who was on scene, part of what he needed to do and me is to move things. So, once things were thoroughly documented, we had to start excavating things and moving things, which allows for [06:31:30] sifting through the ash and debris. So, this is the same area as the money and the burnt pants or shorts, just with the couch removed.
Speaker 16: 135DDDD.
Matt Austin: So, once we started to really dig through the ash and move things, we discovered two items in that same general area, as the feathers and the burnt money, and item 12. And then [06:32:00] another item were small pieces of metal, suspected bullet fragments that were disfigured and right in a fairly large area of coagulated blood.
Speaker 16: Moving back one, could you point to 12, the placard?
Matt Austin: So, 12 is the higher one, closer to the table. And then 13 is the lower cardboard placard. [06:32:30] And both of these were suspected bullets or bullet fragments.
Speaker 16: Is this near where items one, two, three were located, the cash and feathers?
Matt Austin: Yes. If you were to overlay those photos, they're dang near on top of each other, but you can see this burnt rectangle, that's where the burnt couch was. This is after a lot of movement of those items. And starting to slowly brush away soot and burnt feathers and the burnt clothing.
Speaker 16: [06:33:00] And I'm sorry, we asked you about DDDD. 135EEEE.
Matt Austin: This was the other suspected bullet or bullet fragment located in that same area.
Speaker 16: Could you point the fragment for us?
Matt Austin: On the left, you can see the typical rounded shape, but then the back half or this on the right is pretty disfigured and disformed.
Speaker 16: Have you ever experienced that in dealing with crime scene, a bullet being melted by fire?
Matt Austin: No, [06:33:30] I have not.
Speaker 16: 135FFFF.
Matt Austin: This is that altered closeup. So, I've collected 12, I've moved 12, and now we're taking better photographs. And you can start to see more detail of the suspected bullet.
Speaker 16: 135GGGG.
Matt Austin: This is the same. This is a closeup of the suspected bullet collected as item 13.
Speaker 16: 135HHHH.
Matt Austin: This is a photograph of the [06:34:00] back door on that back porch, this time with the door closed. I found it with the door open, but I wanted to capture what the door looked like had it been closed. And there was blood or suspected blood stain on the exterior of the door. And you can also see some of the black fingerprint powder that we talked about on the sides of the white doorframe.
Speaker 16: When you say fingerprint powder, does that mean you've applied it?
Matt Austin: Yes. Yes. This photograph would've been after that fingerprint work.
Speaker 16: [06:34:30] State's Exhibit 135IIII.
Matt Austin: This is that same back door, this time from inside the house. So, we'd be looking outside the door. And there was a mysterious pattern. The door is really sooty. Normally, this would be clear glass. You can't see through it, but near the door handle is some sort of a stain that appeared to be some sort of a liquid.
Speaker 16: [06:35:00] 135JJJJ.
Matt Austin: So, there was those two vehicles in the garage. This is the red pickup truck. As part of processing, we went through the truck, took photographs. This is from the passenger side, looking across the front of the truck.
Speaker 16: The glove box is open in this photo?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Speaker 16: Do you have any idea when that would've been opened?
Matt Austin: I do not.
Speaker 16: Any idea who might've opened it?
Matt Austin: No, but swabs were taken for touch DNA from that. Again, on the theory that [06:35:30] firefighters probably didn't do it, so let's see who touched it.
Speaker 16: Is there also a phone in this car?
Matt Austin: There was a phone in this car as well.
Speaker 16: Is that in the center console?
Matt Austin: Yes, it was.
Speaker 16: State's Exhibit 135KKKK.
Matt Austin: As a part of most of our cases, we are also looking for signs of forced entry. So, this is a photograph of the doorframe component of the back door. [06:36:00] There's no primarks, there's no tool marks, there's no visible damage.
PART 12 OF 13 ENDS [06:36:04]
Matt Austin: There's no pry marks, there's no tool marks, there's no visible damage to that latch plate.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 135, quadruple L.
Matt Austin: Same idea. This is now the front door. If you recall the broken out window to the side of the door, both of these locks were found or both of these latch plates were found undamaged.
Mr. Kinsler: [06:36:30] You also collected some physical exhibits, correct?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Your Honor, may I approach-
Judge Chris Ber...: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: ... the witness? What I was intending to do is maybe hand these to him. Is it all right if I stand next to him?
Samuel H. Shama...: No objection, Your Honor. No objection, sir.
Judge Chris Ber...: [06:37:00] Oh, I thought you said objection.
Samuel H. Shama...: No, no objection.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you. I want to show you what's been marked as State's Exhibit 126. Judge, [inaudible 06:37:14].
Judge Chris Ber...: How many exhibits do you have on the table?
Mr. Kinsler: It's a number of them but some of them are very small.
Samuel H. Shama...: Your Honor, we have no objection if he desires to question from up there.
Judge Chris Ber...: [inaudible 06:37:29]. So [06:37:30] you can stay [inaudible 06:37:33]. One second. Mr. Shamansky, if it becomes a vision issue-
Samuel H. Shama...: No, I'm good, Judge.
Judge Chris Ber...: Okay.
Samuel H. Shama...: Thank you, sir.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 26, do you recognize that?
Matt Austin: Yes, I do.
Mr. Kinsler: And what is that?
Matt Austin: So this is item one. I recognize this is a sticker that I would've created on scene and packaged with, and then this is a tape seal with the date and my initials on it. Item one [06:38:00] was burnt paper bills and the wallet. This was found near that burnt couch.
Mr. Kinsler: And that was labeled in your photos as item one?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. I don't think I need you to open that one.
Matt Austin: Okay.
Mr. Kinsler: [inaudible 06:38:15].
Speaker 18: Okay.
Mr. Kinsler: I'm going to show you what's been marked as State's Exhibit 27. Do you recognize that?
Matt Austin: I do.
Mr. Kinsler: And what is that?
Matt Austin: This is item two. [06:38:30] Again, I recognize my sticker and my date and signature on the back. Item two was the feathers from the couch near the burnt corner.
Mr. Kinsler: Again, we saw a photo of those feathers with placard number two.
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 28. Oh, I'm sorry. State's Exhibit 28.
Matt Austin: [06:39:00] So this is item three in my inventory, and this is the suspected clothing and the key that was found near the burnt couch.
Mr. Kinsler: You described it as blue color, is that correct?
Matt Austin: Mm-hmm. Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: How large article of clothing [inaudible 06:39:14]?
Matt Austin: The pieces that remained were, if you added it all up, probably smaller than this envelope or about the size of this.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay.
Matt Austin: Again, we couldn't tell if it was pants or shorts, but it appeared to be pants or shorts.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. I'm going to show you State's Exhibit 29. Do [06:39:30] you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This is my envelope with my initials and date. Item four, this is that pink cell phone with case. Things have obviously happened to this after I collected it, but I do recognize it.
Mr. Kinsler: And I'm sorry, what was the item?
Matt Austin: Item four.
Mr. Kinsler: That was Angela's phone?
Matt Austin: Yes. Pink cell phone case with phone and IDs belonging to [06:40:00] Angela Strussion.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 30. Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This is what I collected as item five. Again, my seal on the back. And this is multiple black and blue bank money bags with soot and receipts. And these were located on the master bedroom floor by the burnt box spring.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. [06:40:30] Item number five, blue bag, blue bank bags. I'm sorry, what else did you say was in there?
Matt Austin: Multiple black and blue money bags with soot and receipts.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And it's your item number five?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 31. Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This [06:41:00] contains item six, which is that Budweiser case inside the master closet that was tipped over and had receipts in it. Again, my sticker and I recognize my seal.
Mr. Kinsler: I believe that is State's Exhibit 32. Oh, I'm sorry. No, it's not. [06:41:30] No, it is. State's Exhibit 32, is that correct?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This is item seven. Again, my sticker, I recognize my handwriting back there. And this is bank money bags on the kitchen island. Again, item seven.
Mr. Kinsler: [06:42:00] State's Exhibit 36. Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. I don't think we talked about it as we went through the photographs, but I had been informed that the stove top was found on by firefighters and there was that pot and a glass bottle that both appeared to experience a color change, [06:42:30] like they were hot. So on the speculation that the oven had been left on, these are the four knobs that would've turned on the oven burners, individually packaged A through D. These are the four knobs from the stove.
Mr. Kinsler: Did you have an item number for that?
Matt Austin: Item 15.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 38. [06:43:00] Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This is my item 17. Again, my seal, and this is the phone located on the vanity in the bathroom on the first floor.
Mr. Kinsler: We saw a photo associated with that.
Matt Austin: We did. We didn't see a placard on it, but we saw the phone. It was collected as item 17.
Mr. Kinsler: [06:43:30] Show you what's been marked as State's Exhibit 43. Do you recognize that?
Matt Austin: I do. This is item number 22, and this is a swab for potential touch DNA from that pickup truck glove box latch area. [06:44:00] So in here is essentially a long Q-tip that we moisten with a special chemical and then scrub where we think someone might have touched, to try to extract those oils and skin cells.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 49. Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This is item 28. Again, it's a swab for potential touch DNA, and this is from the back swinging [06:44:30] glass door handle. So again, thinking about likely touch places, this is from the inside of the back door.
Mr. Kinsler: Just one moment, Your Honor.
Judge Chris Ber...: Sure.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 50. [06:45:00] Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This is item 29. Again, it's a swab for potential touch DNA. And this is from that opened cabinet door that was to the left of the stove.
Mr. Kinsler: And that was of interest to you why?
Matt Austin: Nothing else in the kitchen appeared disturbed. There weren't a bunch of other cabinet doors open. It would be unlikely, in my opinion, that firefighters would be checking [06:45:30] cupboards for fire. So it stood out as different.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 51, do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do.
Mr. Kinsler: And what is that?
Matt Austin: This is item 30. This is another touch swab, and this is from a different cabinet door. It was closed, but it's the cabinet to the right of the stove that also contained pots and pans. So could have been opened and then closed, but it was in the area of [06:46:00] potential interest with the stove that had been reportedly found on.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 52. Do you recognize that?
Matt Austin: I do. This is item 31, which is a swab collected from another cabinet door to the left of the stove.
Mr. Kinsler: Is there any reason that was of interest to you?
Matt Austin: Same answer as all the other cabinet doors [06:46:30] and the stove knobs. The arson investigator stated or had informed me that this was a potential fire origin or attempt, so this was an area that we spent some time working on.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 55. Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This is another swab for potential touch [06:47:00] DNA. This is from the tall dresser in the master bedroom that had the TV on it. I think four or five different drawers were found open. So all of those knobs were swabbed as one to try to get the most potential touch DNA off the dresser.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 56. Do you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: I do. This was collected by me as item 35. Same concept. This is from the open bedside table [06:47:30] drawer that had the two handguns in it. So a swab for touch DNA.
Mr. Kinsler: State's Exhibit 57. Did you recognize that item?
Matt Austin: Yes, I do.
Mr. Kinsler: And what is that item?
Matt Austin: So State's Exhibit [06:48:00] 57 is touch DNA swabs from the dresser with the TV. I misspoke. And item 34, there was a second dresser in the bedroom and this was swabs from that dresser. So just to clarify, 34 is the tall dresser and 36 is the dresser with the TV. So I misspoke.
Mr. Kinsler: Thank you. State's Exhibit 60, do you recognize that?
Matt Austin: Yes, I do.
Mr. Kinsler: And [06:48:30] what is that item?
Matt Austin: This is item 39, and this is three latent prints collected from the front and back doors. So in here is like a clear transparency sheet that you may remember from grade school. We use clear tape to collect the fingerprint and then we just tape that onto the clear acetate so there's no contamination issues. They can get packaged together. So these are collected fingerprints from the scene.
Mr. Kinsler: But there's actually a number of different prints from a number of different locations?
Matt Austin: Three, yes.
Mr. Kinsler: [06:49:00] State's Exhibit 163. Do you recognize that?
Matt Austin: I do. This is collected as item 12, and this was that suspected lead projectile found on the living room floor where the burnt clothing and the money were, near the burnt couch.
Mr. Kinsler: Which we saw in the photo?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Placard wall.
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Likewise, State's Exhibit 164, do you recognize [06:49:30] that item?
Matt Austin: Yes. 164 is item 13, which was the second suspected projectile located in that same area.
Mr. Kinsler: And again, something we saw in the video?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: Excuse me, we saw a photograph?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: [06:50:00] In addition to the items that we presented here today, I guess the first question I'll ask you is those items, those physical items that are now positioned behind you, are those all items you collected on the 21st of September 2021?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Those all bear the markings or signature that you would've done on that date?
Matt Austin: They do, in addition to some other things. So if I can [06:50:30] just point out item 39, just for example, like I said earlier, I recognize my tape seal with my initials and my date and my sticker, but when things get sent to our lab for additional testing, they often get a different sticker. So I didn't make this sticker and then I recognize probably one of our scientists' signatures. It's common practice to not damage the initial seal and make a new seal. So [06:51:00] some of these items appear to have been opened six, seven, eight times. There should be corresponding different seals to kind of help tell the story. So it's largely familiar, but then there's stuff that I did not create on the packaging.
Mr. Kinsler: And is that common?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. What is the point of all that, the point of people making additional openings or [inaudible 06:51:27]?
Matt Austin: To help preserve and tell the story. If my original seal [06:51:30] were to get cut, it's harder for me to verify my handwriting or the date if the bag keeps getting opened in the same spot.
Mr. Kinsler: I've asked you about those physical items. Did you collect some additional physical items?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And I want to just... We're not going to admit those, but I want to ask you about some of those. Did you collect any computers?
Matt Austin: Yes. I believe it's two. I'd have to refresh, but there were some computers upstairs in that office on the second floor.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. [06:52:00] If I told you those were items eight and nine and they were in that upstairs office, would that sound correct?
Matt Austin: It sounds correct. It would also be documented in my report.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did you collect that gas can and the red gas can from the garage?
Matt Austin: Yes. And those were items eight and nine, I believe.
Mr. Kinsler: I believe the gas can might be item 11. [inaudible 06:52:26] verify that.
Matt Austin: [06:52:30] Yes. The Clorox bleach was item 10 and the gas can was item 11.
Mr. Kinsler: The phones that we saw photographs of, are those all things you collected?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. And if I'm not mistaken, there was a wooden box in the closet. Did you collect that as well?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: And [06:53:00] there was like a paper bag from the buckle store?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. We talked about you doing DNA. Do you have any idea how many different places you did touch DNA?
Matt Austin: Not off the top of my head. I think that's most of them, but I would have to kind of dig through the report to fully refresh my memory.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Did you do the truck door?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Both passenger and driver's side?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: [06:53:30] Okay. Would you have done the exterior of the back door or exterior handle of the back door?
Matt Austin: Yes, that would be common practice to do inside and outside of nearly all the doors.
Mr. Kinsler: I'm going to ask you kind of as a group, did you collect touch DNA from the interior handle of back door, the interior door jamb, the metal garage handle to the left? [06:54:00] Are all those areas you would've collected touch DNA from?
Matt Austin: That sounds consistent with how we would process.
Mr. Kinsler: Is it common that you're going to... Things like door handles are something you're going to do touch DNA on?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Likewise, I'd like to ask you about swabbing for blood. There was blood on the scene, correct?
Matt Austin: Correct.
Mr. Kinsler: And I think we talked about it in the photos, but there was some blood on the black sliding door, or excuse me, the back door, [06:54:30] as well as the exterior back door swab and a swab from the exterior of the back glass door and from a swinging glass door. Does that all sound accurate?
Matt Austin: Yes.
Mr. Kinsler: The prints, to your knowledge, was there any additional print work that you did other than those?
Matt Austin: Not that we haven't already talked about, no.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. [06:55:00] We talked about the bags. Was there cash in any of those bank bags?
Matt Austin: I don't believe so.
Mr. Kinsler: And I should specify, I think we saw a photo of change, coins. I mean paper cash. Did you see any paper cash in any of those bags?
Matt Austin: I don't believe so. I do [06:55:30] remember that some of the bags that were zipped all the way closed, I didn't even want to risk potentially smudging or contaminating, and those got collected and sent straight to the lab. So some of the bags, I didn't do an inventory of just to fully preserve.
Mr. Kinsler: Outside of what we just testified here today, did you locate any other money in the house, like cash, currency?
Matt Austin: No.
Mr. Kinsler: What do you do with the touch DNA, bloodstain swabs, [06:56:00] print work that you do? Where does that go? Who do you give that to?
Matt Austin: So as a part, kind of coming full circle to the fact that we're an assist agency, all of these items plus the other ones collected before I left the scene all get turned over to the sheriff's office along with the printed inventory, a spreadsheet of everything, and it's essentially their case from that point forward. The report takes a little bit longer to write and then deliver along with the scans or any other [06:56:30] special work we do, a diagram they might get a couple days later, but essentially, it's theirs to run with after that. It's common for us to provide some insight or some recommendations. I like this item over this item, but we're, again, just the visitor who's helping out.
Mr. Kinsler: So ultimately, the decision as to what is tested is made by who?
Matt Austin: The agency that we're working for.
Mr. Kinsler: And does BCI offer these lab services that we're talking about?
Matt Austin: They do.
Mr. Kinsler: Does BCI test [06:57:00] everything?
Matt Austin: No, they don't.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Are there restrictions on that?
Matt Austin: Yes. While it's still BCI, the lab is an entirely different entity than investigations. It's not uncommon for us to collect 30 or 50 things, but the lab with their rules and their workflow might only test five or eight in a case.
Mr. Kinsler: In your experience, does the lab give input on those decisions, like which items to test?
Matt Austin: In some cases, if asked, yes.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Do [06:57:30] you know who ultimately makes that call?
Matt Austin: Ultimately, it's the agency.
Mr. Kinsler: Okay. Nothing further, Your Honor. Thank you.
Judge Chris Ber...: All right.
Mr. Kinsler: [inaudible 06:57:41].
Judge Chris Ber...: Mr. Shamansky, do you have any cross examination?
Samuel H. Shama...: I do not. Thank you, Your Honor.
Judge Chris Ber...: May this witness be excused?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes, Your Honor.
Judge Chris Ber...: Thank you, sir.
Matt Austin: Thank you. Would you like me to return these or do anything with the physical?
Judge Chris Ber...: [06:58:00] Leave those right there.
Matt Austin: Okay.
Judge Chris Ber...: [inaudible 06:58:01].
Matt Austin: All right. Thank you, Your Honor.
Joseph Vavra: Approach, Your Honor?
Judge Chris Ber...: Yes. All right. Ladies [06:59:00] and gentlemen of the jury, the State advised me they've reached a good point to stop for the day. So once again, you're getting out a little early. I don't really want to sound like a broken record, but they're very important, the admonitions [06:59:30] I give you, so I'm going to repeat them one more time. When you leave here today, make sure you have no discussions with anyone about this case. You don't let anybody have a discussion in front of you about this case. Do not read any media reports, TV, print, online about this case. Don't undertake any private investigation to learn more about this case, and do not post anything online [07:00:00] about this case. With that said, I thank you all for being very attentive here today, and I'll see you all 8:45 AM tomorrow morning. Thank you.
[07:00:30] Before we recess for the day, we are outside the presence of the jury, Mr. Vavra or Mr. Kinsler, does the State have any issues it needs to address?
Joseph Vavra: Judge, we will... One of the issues that came up a little earlier, we're going to take a look at. [07:01:00] We can recess. We can leave that after the recess and we can address the court before leaving today or tomorrow morning if need be on that issue.
Samuel H. Shama...: If there's a need, Your Honor.
Judge Chris Ber...: Okay. But the parties do plan to have a discussion that may address a potential issue?
Samuel H. Shama...: Yes, sir.
Judge Chris Ber...: Okay. Mr. Shamansky, do you have any issues that need addressed?
Samuel H. Shama...: Do not, Your Honor. Thank you, sir.
Judge Chris Ber...: Okay. Then this court will be in recess. I would like the parties here tomorrow by 8:30 AM. Is the State collecting the [07:01:30] exhibits right here?
Mr. Kinsler: Yes, Your Honor.
Judge Chris Ber...: Okay. Then the court will be in recess.
Joseph Vavra: Thank you. Yes...